this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2024
699 points (94.3% liked)

Political Memes

5432 readers
2490 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 76 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

I'm not gonna suggest that it's right that US companies often evade government scrutiny and action, but I also don't think it's hypocritical for a country to be interested in protecting itself from other countries. That's just national interest. We need protections within the country too, but that's not the same conversation.

And tbh, the meme is pretty on point because a family may treat each other poorly often, but they are much less accepting of an outside party doing the same as it can be seen as a risk to the group at large.

[–] MagnyusG 62 points 8 months ago (4 children)

people seem to glaze over the fact that China is at odds with the United States politically, the ban has little to do with protecting people's privacy and more to do with preventing another country from having such an influential tool ready at their fingertips.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Also I know it's the whole "you are not immune to propoganda" meme but look at the reactions to this bill online. If this isn't proof enough that ByteDance has the tools and ability to push an agenda through their app idk what is, and the U.S. has already had enough problems with foreign interference. If we cannot trust ByteDance not to retaliate against the U.S. when profits are on the line, they probably shouldn't be trusted with so much control on what our citizens are watching and hearing.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I don't like this bill because it's another bandaid solution to a systemic problem. Okay, so we ban Tik Tok, but that won't stop Chinese and Russian actors from using other social media to do the same thing. If Tik Tok is a problem then so are Truth Social and Parler.

[–] blanketswithsmallpox 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Don't let perfect be the enemy of good.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Except I don't consider this to be "good." There's already rumors about people in the US buying Tik Tok to get around this ban. They'll be doing the same bullshit but because it's American bullshit it's suddenly okay.

I don't want Steve Mnuchin to have my data just like I don't want the CCP to have it.

[–] blanketswithsmallpox 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I don't want Steve Mnuchin to have my data just like I don't want the CCP to have it.

That's not hard to get around though. It just costs money because most of everything you consume on the internet is free because sites make money through ads.

Use a VPN, Firefox, disposable emails and usernames, and you're already 95% of the way there. None of it is magic, propaganda is generally pretty damn obvious, look at what you're viewing through the lens of reality and not the bias of wherever you're seeing it.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Okay, how about this: I don't want Steve Mnuchin to be able to influence elections just like I don't want the CCP to be able to do it.

[–] blanketswithsmallpox 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Vote Democrat and push to get Citizens United repealed. Until then he's going to have more power that way anyway.

Even after that repeal, billionaires will have that influence regardless. Public opinion means squat when there's a select minority voting against their constituents wishes anyway.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

push

People say that like anyone knows where to push. Should I be looking for a lever or a button? Is it labeled?

billionaires will have that influence regardless

Which is exactly my problem with this: Yes, letting the CCP influence are elections is bad. But so is letting billionaires, but nobody in the government seems to give a damn.

[–] blanketswithsmallpox 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Okay, I pushed all those links. Is that what I should be pushing?

[–] blanketswithsmallpox 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Your hand to vote. That's it. There's not much else to do mate.

Help your friends who would also vote democrat or people on the fence. Otherwise there's not much to do lol. Regardless, demeanor matters, and the internet is a real place. Apathy kills.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I don't have friends and have been voting consistently - including primaries - since 2000.

If that's all I can do that's... disheartening.

[–] blanketswithsmallpox 1 points 8 months ago

That's democracy lol.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago

Not to mention how the local area average content algorithm is a known tool of those foreign policing units to keep Chinese nationals abroad in line even when they specifically avoid downloading anything the CCP could normally use to keep an eye on them.

People are getting mad that their right to participate in the extraterritorial oppression of Chinese folks is being infringed because it also involves them getting to watch videos of reddit drama stories set to shitty Minecraft parkour.

[–] GladiusB 2 points 8 months ago

Bull. Being at odds with someone is about protection. We should want our information to be free from whatever they want it for. I don't like the bigger US companies doing it either. But that is usually for profit. Who knows what a foreign nation that hates us wants it for.

[–] assassinatedbyCIA 4 points 8 months ago

I find it hypocritical that America forces it's tech down other countries throats and demands open markets globally while wanting to now close off their market once they have a viable foreign competitor. I agree it's logically the right move but, I still find it hypocritical.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think the most hypocritical part is obviously the guise of data privacy. But even regarding national security or foreign influence, I think there is some hypocrisy because we know that there are foreign actors on Facebook, for example, as well.

[–] ForgotAboutDre 2 points 8 months ago

The foreign actors don't control Facebook. They only exploit it. This is a significant difference.

[–] NevermindNoMind -4 points 8 months ago

Back in my day we had an open internet. But "China bad" has gotten to the point where we're ok with the government deciding which countries are allowed to have apps in the US market. I definitely don't see any problems with establishing that kind of precedent.

If your worried about China influencing and/or spying on US citizens via a social media app, there are things the US could do short of a forced sale or outright ban (and not an actual ban btw, this is the government telling app stores what apps they're allowed to carry, another super cool precedent). Maybe a public education campaign, like DARE but for tik tok, maybe it's convincing influencers to switch platforms, maybe it's dumping some money into alternatives like the fediverse. Or you could just wait a year or two until TikTok loses popularity like every other social media platform ever.

Anyway, we need to stop pretending this argument is about anything like spying or Chinese mind control. For Republicans it's simply China bad. For Democrats it's about protecting meta and Google, donors, from TikTok kicking their ass in the free market.

It's dumb, short sighted, a horrible precedent, and people cheer it on at their own perril.