this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2024
47 points (73.3% liked)

Games

32586 readers
1675 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago (18 children)
[–] Stamau123 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

They have been gaining a reputation for poor writing, 'wheadonesque' if you know the term. Some lowlights on the game Forspoken that they worked on being a recent funny example. I don't like them because I do find the writing bad, but some people don't like them for their politics.

[–] takeda 5 points 8 months ago

They are contractor writers, if a company is using such services for their games instead of hiring their own staff writers, then they are not that interested in quality.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

wheadonesque

I thought Joss Wheadon was known for good writing and snappy dialogue?

[–] BluesF 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Snappy, witty, but ultimately shallow. Good lines, not necessarily great stories.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat 2 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Are we pretending that Buffy, Firefly, and Doll House weren't great stories?

[–] Buddahriffic 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Cabin in the Woods remains one of my favorite comedy horror movies to this day.

[–] bigmclargehuge 1 points 8 months ago

IMO that one works because of how little character each actual character has by design. Dumb jock is dumb and jocky, stoner is stoned, virgin is timid. It's a play on the lack of real character that mid to low budget horror movies often have.

It's a great movie but I do find when Wheadon tries to do anything else, it just simmers down to kitchy one-liners that elicit a mild chuckle and nothing else, and that gets old very quickly.

[–] Cypher 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

There’s no pretending, they’re all middling trash.

Firefly gets by solely on the setting.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Firefly gets by solely on the setting.

So Space shows are popular just because they are in space? Andromeda would like a word...

[–] MolochAlter 0 points 8 months ago

Speaking as a huge fan of firefly, I'm not even gonna pretend that the writing doesn't have a very specific set of issues, and that cancellation might have saved it from becoming aggressively mid and boring.

If Serenity was more or less the intended ending to the season (specifically revealing the alliance actually created the reapers and are unequivocally villainous) I'm actually happy they didn't get to put that in the show.

Same for the Shepherd Book backstory comic where he was actually a brown coat double agent in the alliance, because god forbid we have to accept that your enemy isn't ontologically evil.

But the best criticism I've seen of Whedon is that all his dialogue has over time exceedingly forgone character voice in favour of funny quips.

So much of his later production's quotable lines are almost impossible to attribute correctly just from the lines themselves.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (29 children)

Apparently they don't like Sweet Baby's focus on "promoting inclusivity", so just some bigot getting their panties on a twist that the "out-group" is being treated with a basic level of human dignity. They then spent a bunch of time and effort to let the world know they think inclusivity is bad.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

people should be free to know who worked on the game they buy. If they don't like sweetbaby's products, then they are free to not pay money for them. Transparency is good.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And is this information hidden in some way?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

not anymore, thanks to that plugin

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's not a plugin, and as far as I know it uses publicly available information.

I just don't understand the use case. So people look for a game they'd like to try, then go and check that list, then go back and purchase the game if it's not on the list? Why? If they make games bad the reviews will tell you the game is bad.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (17 children)

It's perfectly reasonable for people to say "I don't want to buy a game that Sweetbaby worked on". It's their choice.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)