this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
690 points (99.1% liked)
196
16503 readers
1972 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
when you explain & rationalize it like that, it seems fine and logical except
is SO blatantly sick & wrong & unjust on a fundamental level ๐ก
just wait until you hear about how academic publishing works
Sadly that's pretty much how all media works. The creator may have had the idea, but they usually license that idea out for a specific use to a specific entity in perpetuity. Usually because that entity is putting up all the money to create it. Almost always because the cost is well beyond what any independent creator can afford or to risk. Maybe if you are a Spielberg who has their own studios at this point, but that's pretty much it. :/
I can count on one hand how many times someone's creative endeavors that when aired/sold to a network went back to them. I can't begin to tell you how many times someone has a 100% original idea, a network funded it, aired it at such a bad time or had such bad ad campaign for it, it failed.
Then the network claims it as a tax write off so it never gets aired again, and no DVD/Blu-Ray sales are allowed. And the artists who worked on it can't get any rights to what they made. Because a company somewhere couldn't make money with the idea, now no one can. Even the inventor.
Animation is among the more common ones to have this happen to.