this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
826 points (98.1% liked)

Confidently Incorrect

4031 readers
9 users here now

When people are way too smug about their wrong answer.

Posting guidelines.

All posts in this community have come from elsewhere, it is not original content, the poster in this community is not OP. The person who posts in this community isn’t necessarily endorsing whatever the post is talking about and they are not looking to argue with you about the content in the post.

You are welcome to discuss and debate any topic but arguments are not welcome here. I consider debate/discussions to be civil; people with different opinions participating in respectful conversations. It becomes an argument as soon as someone becomes aggressive, nasty, insulting or just plain unpleasant. Report argumentative comments, then ignore them.

There is currently no rule about how recent a post needs to be because the community is about the comeback part, not the topic.

Rules:

• Be civil and remember the human.

• No trolling, insults or name calling. Swearing in general is fine, but not to insult someone.

• No bigotry of any kind, including homophobia, transphobia, sexism and racism.

• You are welcome to discuss and debate any topic but arguments are not welcome here. I consider debate/discussions to be civil; people with different opinions participating in respectful conversations. It becomes an argument as soon as someone becomes aggressive, nasty, insulting or just plain unpleasant. Report argumentative comments, then ignore them.

• Try not to get too political. A lot of these posts will involve politics, but this isn’t the place for political arguments.

• Participate in good faith - don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguements sake.

• Mark NSFW posts if they contain nudity.

• Satire is allowed but please start the post title with [satire] so other users can filter it out if they’d like.

Please report comments that break site or community rules to the mods. If you break the rules you’ll receive one warning before being banned from this community.

This community follows the rules of the lemmy.world instance and the lemmy.org code of conduct. I’ve summarised them here:

  1. Be civil, remember the human.
  2. No insulting or harassing other members. That includes name calling.
  3. Respect differences of opinion. Civil discussion/debate is fine, arguing is not. Criticise ideas, not people.
  4. Keep unrequested/unstructured critique to a minimum.
  5. Remember we have all chosen to be here voluntarily. Respect the spent time and effort people have spent creating posts in order to share something they find amusing with you.
  6. Swearing in general is fine, swearing to insult another commenter isn’t.
  7. No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia or any other type of bigotry.
  8. No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sabin10 42 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Reminds me of a guy I worked with. He even started the occasional sentence with "contrary to fact" before telling me you can order super powerful quantum computers on Ali express that can run your entire steam library concurrently.

[–] dejected_warp_core 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

run your entire steam library concurrently.

What's hilarious about this assertion, is what the intersection of quantum computing and conventional gaming would look like. Quantum is, roughly, all about taking a vast array of possible outcomes for a system and collapsing all of that into a single, highly probable, result*. So running a game through a quantum computer would effectively "solve" it. So, enjoy watching the most statistically likely ending for every AAA game out there - no controller required.

(* "In linear time." Which is fancy computer science talk for "many orders of magnitude faster than the conventional way." But you still have to stack the math to make this work, which isn't always easy or possible.)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

That's not what a "game" is. A "game" has interactivity and would not be solved by the computer automatically

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Yeah, I’m picturing 500 headless window processes that – if you connected to them with a display – would show a different game screen variation of “press any key to start “.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] dejected_warp_core 1 points 11 months ago

That's kind of where I was going with this. I suppose human input itself could be solved using some quantum function, but the statistical average of all human input would probably not yield a successfully completed game. At least, if achievement metrics on Steam are anything to go by.

[–] stoly 8 points 11 months ago

That's not how quantum computers work. They'd be terribly bad at doing the things that transistor-based computers do. They are run in a completely different way.

[–] Leviathan 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Why would you need a super powerful quantum computer for that?

[–] saltesc 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Life races on, I have fewer and fewer hours in the day to game, and my Steam library is getting to 200 like I'm getting to 40. Hook me the fuck up Ali Express.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I had the Humble Bundle monthly subscription for a year. I'm at over 500 games with no hope to ever play them all, let alone best them.

[–] saltesc 3 points 11 months ago

Make sure your will hands the catalogue onto someone that will appreciate it. Mine's going to my goddaughter. She's only 14 but she fucking understands this shit and the value of it all. Hell of a legacy to just mistakingly let die off into the digital aether.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

the bigger question seems to be that apparently those super powerful quantum computers run x86_64 architecture. Not sure its support for quantum commands though, seems like a waste of money just for the "quantum" name

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Well in fairness, a quantum computer would probably be more like a GPU - you'd still need a CPU, and you'd use it to control the quantum piece for specific tasks

Quantum code is extremely different, we don't know how to write it well yet. Quantum processors are also only suitable for certain problems - they're not faster, they can just take a problem with a definite answer and skip looking through the problem space to collapse into a solution

It would be insane to rewrite an os for a far less efficient, hundreds of thousands of times more expensive quantum CPU than to just attach it to a normal computer

So a quantum computer would very likely use x64 Linux, and if so could probably run games... Except who knows if it even would even have integrated graphics, it would probably only ever be used as a server so that many people can queue up tasks... at least until we have several nobel-award worthy breakthroughs