this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
322 points (99.1% liked)

3DPrinting

15653 readers
225 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: [email protected] or [email protected]

There are CAD communities available at: [email protected] or [email protected]

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Oh, AutoDesk...you have such a way with words. Honestly, I would rather learn to design in OpenSCAD than send AutoDesk a single penny.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] infinitepcg 15 points 11 months ago (3 children)

We need something like Affinity for CAD. Surely it must be possible to make a CAD program that can do the basics you need for 3D printing without all the advanced simulations and analysis. I just want to draw some sketches and extrude them.

[–] Bluetreefrog 9 points 11 months ago (3 children)

FreeCAD. I'm not sure why more people aren't using tbh.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Every time I've used FreeCAD it felt miserable to use. Idk if I was doing something wrong, but it felt horrendous

[–] Maalus 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I've used it for the past year, and no - you aren't doing anything wrong. Had the same experience, and the privilege to compare it to Solidworks. There is no contest, other than price ofc

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Hell, I'd rather use Blender than FreeCAD. FOSS devs really need to get some UI and UX designers involved. Or at least someone with the skill set to know how to make not-ass UIs and UXs

[–] the16bitgamer 5 points 11 months ago

IMHO its because the software lack a lot of polish. At times i found FreeCAD is better that fusion. But for the amount of pain it takes to get the software to work, it makes me want to look elsewhere.

But man are the tools in freecad good, when they work. Just wish it was multithreaded

[–] Maalus 2 points 11 months ago

FreeCAD is soooo shitty. The history breaks all the time - small changes introduce so many issues you might just be better off by starting over.

[–] grayman 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

OpenCAD. But it's like Photoshop vs Gimp. But also with a bigger learning curve.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Gimp I got the hang of pretty quickly coming from Photoshop, but switching to OpenCAD has not been a smooth transition from AutoCAD.

[–] grayman 2 points 11 months ago

I agree with that statement.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'd say it's more like Premiere vs ffmpeg.

[–] grayman 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Oh, I literally misread it as OpenSCAD. Laughing at my stupid brain right now.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Solvespace might be exactly what you're looking for. It is FOSS and works well for simple models. Some functionality is missing though, for example chamfers and fillets.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I'll definitely need to check this out, thanks!

[–] mea_rah 1 points 11 months ago

I wish I had time and domain knowledge to add those two to Solvespace. It's the only thing that I'm really missing. And for 3D printing design chamfers are really necessary, the models print much nicer when there are no sharp corners.