this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
975 points (97.0% liked)

196

16597 readers
3423 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Image Transcription:

A tweet from the George Takei Twitter account which states:

"A Democrat was in the White House when my family was sent to the internment camps in 1941. It was an egregious violation of our human and civil rights.

It would have been understandable if people like me said they’d never vote for a Democrat again, given what had been done to us.

But being a liberal, being a progressive, means being able to look past my own grievances and concerns and think of the greater good. It means working from within the Democratic party to make it better, even when it has betrayed its values.

I went on to campaign for Adlai Stevenson when I became an adult. I marched for civil rights and had the honor of meeting Dr. Martin Luther King. I fought for redress for my community and have spent my life ensuring that America understood that we could not betray our Constitution in such a way ever again.

Bill Clinton broke my heart when he signed DOMA into law. It was a slap in the face to the LGBTQ community. And I knew that we still had much work to do. But I voted for him again in 1996 despite my misgivings, because the alternative was far worse. And my obligation as a citizen was to help choose the best leader for it, not to check out by not voting out of anger or protest.

There is no leader who will make the decision you want her or him to make 100 percent of the time. Your vote is a tool of hope for a better world. Use it wisely, for it is precious. Use it for others, for they are in need of your support, too."

End Transcription.

The last paragraph I find particularly powerful and something more people really should take into account.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AngryCommieKender 32 points 1 year ago (4 children)

We need to get RCV passed at the state level in at least 33 states, then we can get rid of FPTP at the federal level, and actually force some change

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

oh if it's that simple then lets just do that. surely we can bang it out in a weekend.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nobody said it was simple, but yes. Let’s do that.

Doing the easy thing is what’s got us to where we are.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

can you pull it off in under a year? because in a year we're gonna have a presidential election and one of the leading candidates is someone whose already been determined by a court to have engaged in insurrection and has said that he'll have the military suppress protests starting day one and will replace 50,000 government functionaries with people whose only qualification is that they're loyal to him personally. his friends tell me every day that god has commanded them to kill me 😀

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would surmise it would take between 15 and 40 years to get it passed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Imagine if we’d started pushing for this in earnest 15 years ago.

Like they say, the second best time to plant a tree is today.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

What might help to effect this change? If I'm not mistaken, a number of states are almost under single-party rule, particularly those that might benefit most from this kind of change.

Is it something that may be built up from a municipal to county to state level to then establish on a national level?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Back in the day the "Moral Majority' took over the GOP by taking over the local offices. If the usual attendance at a meeting was twenty folks, the MMs would make sure to show up with 50. It took them a while, but they were persistent.

[–] AngryCommieKender 2 points 1 year ago

We tried to pass it at a county level here in California, and it passed in several counties, only for the registrar of voters go to the state legislature to overturn it, so, maybe?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Nice idea, but it isn't going to happen before the 2024 elections. First things first.

[–] yesman 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

force some change

RCV favors moderates and promotes political stability. That's kinda the opposite of a revolution.

[–] AngryCommieKender 5 points 1 year ago

That's better than the fascism that FPTP favors. It's not revolutionary, but at least we might start heading in the right direction

[–] Pipoca 2 points 1 year ago

RCV does the opposite, actually. It exhibits center squeeze, where centrists are often eliminated early even if more people prefer them over the eventual winner.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah that happens most of the time in a PR system

Radicals come to power under fair systems by being able to reach disenchanted voters in a national crisis or uproar.