this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
527 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19244 readers
2644 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nutsack 181 points 1 year ago (3 children)

many people in red states think that talent and wealth are moving to red states to escape liberal politics. they are in a different dimension

[–] Burn_The_Right 56 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So true! I have debated ad nauseum with conservatives on this very topic. Their media machine is feeding this absurdity to them and they believe it. They see it as hard evidence that conservative policies are superior to any other policies.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's gotten to the point I don't even talk to people who bring up the topic. You can quote any number of statistics, but they've "dun seen that californian moving in up the road, so there's the proof right there!" I guess the fact that on a ~21 house road, we've got Carolingians, Alabamians, Tex(i)ans, Michiganders, and some Arkansaws folks means that people are fleeing blue states, sure, ayup.

*The post's language is intentional >.>

[–] NewNewAccount 44 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Texas might be the sole case where that’s actually happening. Most of the wealth is being concentrated in and around Austin, though.

[–] Eldritch 55 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes, but they aren't moving for conservative policies or "red state". They're moving to more affordable liberal/socialist friendly enclaves. Like Austin as you pointed out. Conservatives /fascists like to imply otherwise. But they are already panicking as those areas grow in power and influence. Doing everything they can to try to neuter it. Before it changes their state politics to take their power away from them.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Austin hasn’t been affordable since well before the pandemic, and has higher overall taxes for most of the people moving there. Also it’s hot, the electrical grid sucks, and you can’t get an abortion. I just don’t get it.

[–] APassenger 16 points 1 year ago

People think they know what to expect. Then they live it and it's... Exactly what they expected, but more difficult and worse with time.

I spent 30 years in Texas. I miss TexMex, family and a few restaurants, but not much else.

[–] Eldritch 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

More affordable than most places in California. Less earthquakes. Slightly better traffic conditions. More affordable does not necessarily mean cheap. It's still in demand and it's still going to cost more than something like living out in northwest Texas.

[–] olympicyes -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are earthquakes really that big a factor in where people choose to live?

[–] yacht_boy 4 points 1 year ago

If you're talking about California, than earthquakes, fires, floods, and mudslides are all part of the algorith. And if you are wealthy enough to have a choice of where you want to live, the algorithm is less and less in favor of California.

[–] assassin_aragorn 9 points 1 year ago

Yeah they want to have it both ways, which is quite silly and very stupid of them. When you want to attract businesses to your state, and they try to hire young professionals, and young people vote left...

Then again, maybe I'm expecting too much from them.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

And Nashville, but both are purple dots and the moment these states take a harder stance on gender policies they will relo.

Nashville moreso because of rent costs.

[–] youngGoku 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's how a red state becomes a swing state.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Happened in Virginia already.

It's also weird how Virginia and West Virginia have gone, especially when you learn how the split happened in the first place.

[–] afraid_of_zombies 1 points 1 year ago

Texas has more oil than Saudi Arabia and is ideal for certain types of chemical engineering.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

they think they can create their own "dimension" where everything they want to believe is magically true