this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
1601 points (95.2% liked)

Science Memes

11253 readers
5208 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 82 points 1 year ago (10 children)

i hope someday we construct a collider that spans the entire circumference of the earth. But we'd probably have to build one that spans the circumference of the moon first, and then maybe mars, since the oceans are going to be a bit of a doozie to work around that we don't have the technology for, whereas the interior of a collider is supposed to be evacuated, so, the moon almost kinda already handles that for us. heat might be an issue of course, but if we can figure out thermal radiator panels that can dump the heat straight into space, maybe we could pull it off...

mars would address the heat issues, but those dust storms are no joke and the dust itself is microscopic toxic/caustic razors and it'll try to get in everywhere and ruin fine instruments it touches. Moon dust is also really bad but there's no wind to kick it up on the moon obviously...

but damn. DAMN. imagine the fucking science we could get done with a LUNAR-SCALE PARTICLE COLLIDER!!!

[–] Evotech 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Halo

Just gonna throw that out there

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

Master Chief, we need you for one last mission >!bro!<

[–] Zehzin 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Fuck it, orbital collider. Earth deserves a cool ring

[–] agent_flounder 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes. Encircling the Sun

[–] italien 8 points 1 year ago

queue halo theme

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Now I'm imagining placing a ring of gigantic dyson-sphere powered magnets in an intergalactic void to create the final and ultimate supercollider, the size of a galactic supercluster

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

that would legitimately be so fucking cool, but I think at those scales we're actually encroaching on things that truly are physically impossible. If it takes light entire geological eras to move through such a system, any hope of maintaining physical integrity throughout its length is ... exceedingly unlikely. Like, at ranges THAT vast, pretty sure the expansion of spacetime itself would rip it open...

... but i'm still enjoying imagining it :3

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does it actually have to maintain physical integrity as a single structure? If it's not got a vacuum chamber due to relying on the ambient vacuum, then each section of magnets need not physically touch, so the individual components need only use some of the energy from their power source to actively steer themselves into formation rather than rely on material strength to hold together.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I would expect so on the basis of precision. At scales that large, space itself becomes an unreliable medium...

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gotta build it as an orbital ring.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also, maybe add some biomes, oceans and wildlife. And absolutely no parasitic life forms trapped in there.

[–] Quadhammer 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Hear me out okay. hits blunt Dyson ring. Maybe we start building it out between earth and Mars. We dig a big ass hole into Mars core and use some kind of laser technology to focus radiation into it perhaps "jump starting" the core. Or maybe we use some kind of cable and gymbal system to run a hard wire into it. hits blunt Then meanwhile we're crashing comets and shit into it to get us some oceans and atmosphere, badabing badaboom we got earth 2.0

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You should put that blunt down, buddy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well check this out: if it's big enough and can collect enough solar energy, it can be a self-powered gargantuan electromagnet and CREATE a magnetosphere for Mars itself. And the moon has a higher silver content than earth, which a) won't tarnish in the vacuum of space and b) is more conductive than copper or gold!

Aluminum alloy structures, silver circuitry, we could build this thing without sending ANY of it's raw materials from earth. It's all already up there waiting for us... ... Some assembly required :p

[–] Quadhammer 2 points 1 year ago

I'm sorry I'm just now seeing this reply because that is fascinating

[–] marcos 10 points 1 year ago

There's probably opportunity to do some really large colliders in space, for much cheaper than on any celestial body.

But then, people are having a really hard time imagining the fucking science we could get done with a lunar-scale particle collider. That's why the merely 100km one isn't getting any money.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The Moon’s daytime is half a month long and can reach 120 C so we’d need some pretty powerful heat shielding. And there’s no ozone layer to protect the electronics from radiation, and I’m pretty sure the Moon orbits outside of Earth’s magnetosphere. And the shielding used for such a project could also be used to fix climate change here (and terraform Venus later) with orbital parasols. And whatever unimaginable technology we’d need for such an ambitious project may as well be used to run a grid of electromagnets and power lines across Mars to give it a magnetic field

[–] KittyCat 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If gravatons are a real particle, we'd need one on on the order of earths orbit around the sun to see it. Maybe someday lol.

[–] Donjuanme 4 points 1 year ago

Or a different mechanism of detection,

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Why do we need to do it around a planet? Origin of Halo confirmed

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Linear collider to Proxima Centauri

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I think on earth is preferential, and you'd have to build it underground anyways in order to shield it from interference.

[–] grue 5 points 1 year ago

I think on earth is preferential

Something something "resonance cascade."

[–] cynar 3 points 1 year ago

At the energies involved, it's akin to a bacteria interfering with a supersonic goods train. The only bit that needs shielding is the detector systems, and that's not THAT hard to do in space. At least if you're at the point of building a space based accelerator.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Even underground there is tons of issues. One for example is that the ground is having tides.

As the moon passes above is the ground is moving by several cm so it has to be compensated by the collider.