this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
189 points (99.5% liked)

196

16925 readers
1417 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
189
Peak Content [Rule] (i.ebayimg.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

And if Wikipedia is to be believed it's presented in a eye wateringly high resolution of 112p.

This high of res.

Edit: Of course the bit rate was pretty damn low as well. Here's a comparison video I found. This comparison uses the higher bit rate version from the Shrek GBA video cart not the Shrek+Shark Tale video cart though so keep in mind, this is the better version.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Exactly

It's honestly impressive they even were able to do it

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, there were way more efficient ways to store video on the go in the 2000s, like MiniDVD players with tiny screens. The codec is in firmware and the video format and medium is standardized. It’s the easiest way to sell small, cheap gigabytes of storage if you need no quick random access. And the family might already have the more useful laptop-like portable DVD player with a full-sized drive and almost every home video title was available on those.