this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
955 points (98.8% liked)

Antiwork

8305 readers
1 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 78 points 1 year ago (7 children)

As someone on the receiving end of this, it may not pan out for you. I was verbally told I was getting a raise, then my paychecks showed I got a larger raise. I thought nothing of it and enjoyed the extra money, thinking of myself as a hard worker who was worth the extra.

Months later, someone noticed the discrepancy. Queue the company informing me that the overpayment will be taken in one lump sum from my next paycheck, which would have made me unable to make rent. I convinced them to spread the repayment across as many checks as they had overpaid, but that was a pretty miserable experience to say the least.

[–] [email protected] 96 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can't really happen here, since the contract had the twisted numbers as well. So they have that amount in writing with signatures and all.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think in some cases you could get fucked if it can be shown that it's an obvious mistake

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, if you switch this around so it's the business paying less then people here would be going irate if the business just said "well we are paying what the contract states". I get it, people hate work. But that doesn't mean you get to screw your employer.

[–] MisterFrog 1 points 1 year ago

It says it right there in the contract. If you sign shit without reading it as the employer, and have been paying it for 9 months, that's on you.

It would be another thing if it was immediately fixed but in either case, be it the employee or employer, if you've been doing it 9 months then that's on you. (If an employee had been getting underpaid - but still a legal amount - and didn't say anything for 9 months, I also think that's on them). Gotta read contracts folks.

[–] shalafi 82 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

You in America? If so, you got screwed and need to call your state labor board.

At least in Florida, they cannot pull that shit. If they put it in your bank account, it's yours. End. Think of all the scams people could pull if they could drop money in your account and then demand it back.

SOURCE: Worked for a payroll firm. If we overpaid someone, or paid the wrong person/account, too damned bad, all we could do was ask nicely for it to be returned.

CAVEAT: The bank can sure as hell pull your funds if it's their mistake.

[–] BottleOfAlkahest 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is likely state dependent. I've seen them pull back funds from people in MD. That was some years ago now though so that may not still be possible there.

[–] Alexstarfire 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

What they can do and what is legal aren't always the same.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

It's legal in MA. I was paid double once and they took it back. I looked into it and sure enough, it's totally legal as long as it's within a certain timeframe.

[–] BottleOfAlkahest 1 points 1 year ago

I should clarify that it was legal in MD when they did it (this may no longer be the case). I had to talk to the company lawyer for guidance when it happened since I was part of the HR team at the time.

[–] unphazed 1 points 1 year ago

Yep, they did this to me and my coworkers in WV. But the NLRB stated since we were overpaid for bonuses, not wages, the company had the right to dock the pay slowly (they did it in 2 biweekly paychecks, notso slow)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

They might not pull funds, but they can absolutely deduct that money from future checks.

[–] [email protected] 74 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm pretty sure that would have been illegal where I live. Paying someone the same amount each month is an implicit contract. You can't just suddenly go "whoops" and not pay for a month.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Depends on what's in the contract, black on white. If the contract says x amount and they pay you y (and you don't speak up), they can get that money back as it was a bookkeeping error.

If the contract says the higher amount then they can't take it back, written contract always wins over verbal.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Fair, but a contract can't overrule actual laws. I'm not sure what exactly those are or where OP lives but if the law says he'd be entitled to that money then a contract couldn't change anything.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I would think it's fairly obvious they are from the UK seeing as they are using the pound symbol for their money - and contracts for employment are king in the UK if I remember correctly

[–] shalafi 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Still, I can't imagine a UK contract can override UK law. You couldn't get someone to sign a contract saying they're a slave and hold them to it. Contracts do not trump laws.

[–] DacoTaco 4 points 1 year ago

Correct, contracts dont trump laws and your extreme example would not fly in court because of it and because it would break humantarian laws and rights agreed upon in our countries.

That said, he speaks the truth. If a contract says you earn x and you earn x+20 euro, they can and will compensate for that 20 euro. Its perfectly legal and ive seen 2 euros go down from my pay because of book keeping errors. However, i assume the law has a margin for book keeping errors, and if not they can demand it back in court. You signed on it after all...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

You do indeed remember correctly. This is a watertight case for the employee.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

That's not how it works in both Germany and Austria. If you have a contract you get paid based on it, if there is a bookkeeping error you have to pay the money back if the company accidentally gives you too much.

The only contracts that are invalid are when the number is very obviously wrong in the context. For example the contract says instead of $50k a year you get paid $500k a year or $5k a year, then the entire thing is void as it's an obvious error.

If the contract says $55k and the company wanted to pay you $45k.. their problem, contract counts. Your boss might be pissed if you keep insisting on the $55k and might fire you, especially if you verbally agreed on $45k. But oh well, that's another topic.

Oh and in the UK? The employer is even allowed to deduct that money from your future wages. So much about knowing the law :)

[–] shalafi 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not where I live they can't. See my other comment. If your employer gives you money, it's yours, period.

I see this idea a lot online. Guess either employees don't understand their rights or the employers are equally ignorant, both VERY likely.

And no, it's unlikely the employer knows better and is fucking around. The magic words are "labor" and "board", who will find in favor of the employee and throw a fucking to the employer. We handled payroll for quite a few shady employers, but none of them were dumb enough to play around with the money.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's not how it works in both Germany and Austria. If you have a contract you get paid based on it, if there is a bookkeeping error you have to pay the money back if the company accidentally gives you too much.

The only contracts that are invalid are when the number is very obviously wrong in the context. For example the contract says instead of $50k a year you get paid $500k a year or $5k a year, then the entire thing is void as it's an obvious error.

If the contract says $55k and the company wanted to pay you $45k.. their problem, contract counts. Your boss might be pissed if you keep insisting on the $55k and might fire you, especially if you verbally agreed on $45k. But oh well, that's another topic.

Oh and in the UK? The employer is even allowed to deduct that money from your future wages. So much about knowing the law :)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah.. except for that tiny detail:

There are three conditions that must be satisfied for the defence to be applicable:

  • You employer has made a statement of fact which made you believe that the money was your own;
  • You acted in good faith and without knowledge of any claim for recovery from your employer and as a result, changed your position in terms of the money; and
  • You were not involved in the cause of the overpayment.

So if you signed a contract for a sum of x and the employer never said they are going to pay you more, you're already acting in bad faith based on the first point. The second point is tough to argue, literally the only way to win this is if you have a verbal "contract" only and claim you never watched your bank account and just didn't notice the extra money (but then if your employer tells you about the wrong payments you have an issue again..).

In the real world you'll probably pay the money back 99% of the time, except if you want to burn bridges and leave (going after you for smaller amounts is not worth the time in court). Your professional relationship will be ruined though, which you may or may not care about.

[–] teruma 6 points 1 year ago

In California at least, they're allowed to ask, but I don't think they're allowed to require.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Meanwhile if they verbally promise you a raise and don't give it to you there's jack shit you can do because verbal agreements aren't enforcable when it's convenient for them.

[–] shalafi -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which is sane. So anyway...

Sorry, gotta go. That's my employer calling to verbally offer me a raise.

(Over here laughing imagining all the people suing because, "I swear he offered me a raise! Nah, for real!")

[–] MisterFrog 1 points 1 year ago

In many countries verbal contracts can still be binding under certain circumstances. Just hard to prove, so yeah, get it in writing or it doesn't mean much

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

(Should be “cue the company” not queue)

[–] SpaceNoodle 1 points 1 year ago