this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2023
2175 points (98.7% liked)

Atheist Memes

5631 readers
1 users here now

About

A community for the most based memes from atheists, agnostics, antitheists, and skeptics.

Rules

  1. No Pro-Religious or Anti-Atheist Content.

  2. No Unrelated Content. All posts must be memes related to the topic of atheism and/or religion.

  3. No bigotry.

  4. Attack ideas not people.

  5. Spammers and trolls will be instantly banned no exceptions.

  6. No False Reporting

  7. NSFW posts must be marked as such.

Resources

International Suicide Hotlines

Recovering From Religion

Happy Whole Way

Non Religious Organizations

Freedom From Religion Foundation

Atheist Republic

Atheists for Liberty

American Atheists

Ex-theist Communities

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

Other Similar Communities

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Churches should be tax liable anyway, regardless of whether they tell you how to vote. Why are they exempt, but other businesses aren't? Or rather, why are other business tax liable when churches aren't?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

aren't most non-profits free from taxation?

[–] Burn_The_Right 32 points 1 year ago

Yes, and they are held to certain standards and have reporting requirements. Churches do not have to do anything except declare they are a church. No standards, no reporting. They can just count their profits.

[–] Rustmilian 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But are all churches really non-profit?

[–] LrdThndr 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd settle for a church that's non-prophet.

[–] Rustmilian 2 points 1 year ago
[–] over_clox 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

God created everything right?

God doesn't need money then.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

God doesn't but the pastor has to eat presumably.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe the pastor should get a job working every day but Wednesday and Sunday?

Sounds like the landlord issue to me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What's happening on Wednesday?

[–] ComicalMayhem 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A lot of churches have small group gatherings, youth church, or other similar events on Wednesdays, while the main service is on Sundays.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It's when they groom the kids. Oops I mean youth group.

[–] afraid_of_zombies 1 points 1 year ago

Wednesday gathering. Mine did it. Umm kinda like an after school program. My most distinct memory of it is the ping pong balls would keep on vanishing so it would be just a table.

[–] SuddenlyBlowGreen 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] havokdj -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Technically you're right, but that example (moses and the others in the wild) is from the old testament which doesn't even apply to Christians. Christians are only to follow the new testament.

[–] SuddenlyBlowGreen 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Technically you’re right, but that example (moses and the others in the wild) is from the old testament which doesn’t even apply to Christians. Christians are only to follow the new testament.

Didn't jesus say that he did not come abolish the law of the prophets (aka the old testament)?

[–] havokdj 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

See that's kind of the thing right? The bible does a lot of back and forth on this shit where the old testament matters one second and then it doesn't the next, but that's aside the point.

Jesus himself did say this, but god rid many of the rules before that as well, so technically that would mean they would be the law of the prophets as well.

One big change for instance is the requirement of a sacrifice to worship god, yet this was changed in the new testament with the sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Yes, some laws before apply such as the ten commandments, but those are also a part of the new testament, they can have overlap.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So what you're saying is that it's all a bunch of nonsense.

[–] havokdj 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why doesn't God just rain manna on the priest like the old days?

[–] afraid_of_zombies 1 points 1 year ago

Budget cuts. Try next heaven business quarter.

[–] havokdj 1 points 1 year ago

Old testament doesn't apply to Christians

[–] JollyTheRancher 2 points 1 year ago

Pastors must eat extremely well

[–] over_clox 2 points 1 year ago

I'm confused now. So if the money goes to God, and God has to eat flesh, then...

So many questions...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Render into Caeser that which is Caeser's, after all.

[–] Lemminary 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right? Talk about privilege and special rights! I don't get why these megachurches have these millionaire pastors flying around in private jets and nobody bats an eye. Right, Joel Olsteens?

[–] BallsInTheShredder 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ngl I'm not against churches in general because I've found a lot of peace there when life was rough, so even if I was an atheist I would still support non-hateful churches.

But megachurches with rich pastors that constantly brag about how God wants them to be wealthy? No. No. No. "It is an abomination" - Butt-Head voice.

[–] RagingRobot 2 points 1 year ago

Even if they give people comfort they should be taxed. Same as prostitutes. I guess they don't usually pay tax either 🤷‍♀️

[–] FrostKing 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

*this is not an opinion just an objective explanation based on the information I have

The reason that churches aren't taxed, legally, is because the US constitution states, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion" There are disagreements about whether taxing everyone including churches counts as a "law respecting an establishment of religion" but that is the current state of affairs.

*this is an opinion, though more of a speculative one

The reason, I believe, that the law mentioned in this post isn't enforced, is because if the did the supreme Court would likely through the case and the law out as a result, for being unconstitutional, as it is unarguably a "law respecting an establishment of religion."