Ask Lemmy

26702 readers

3000 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics.

Rules: (interactive)

1) Be nice and; have fun

Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them

2) All posts must end with a '?'

This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?

3) No spam

Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.

4) NSFW is okay, within reason

Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].

5) This is not a support community.

It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.

Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

206

As far as public support goes, why aren't disabilities and chronic illnesses treated in a similar manner to LGBT issues? (self.asklemmy)

submitted 1 year ago by MossBear to c/asklemmy

101 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm just curious about this. As someone with a chronic illness, I pretty much never hear anyone talk about things related to the sorts of difficulties and discrimination I and others might face within society. I'm not aware of companies or governments doing anything special to bring awareness on the same scale of say, pride month for instance. In fact certain aspects of accessibility were only normalized during the pandemic when healthy people needed them and now they're being gradually rescinded now that they don't. It's annoying for those who've come to prefer those accommodations. It's cruel for those who rely on them.

And just to be clear, I'm not suggesting this is an either or sort of thing. I'm just wondering why it's not a that and this sort of thing. It's possible I'm not considering the whole picture here, and I don't mean for this to be controversial.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Zarxrax 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I've honestly never really heard anyone complaining about it. You need to make a fuss.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You also need to ask us to implement a solution. "Make this wheelchair accessible" is actionable, but I literally have no idea what OP (or the other people who are saying they agree) want

[–] MossBear 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's where it gets tough. I know what might be helpful to me, but that may not have any bearing on somebody else's condition. If there's not a general willingness to want to improve society more broadly then it can just come across as noise in terms of the extent of what's called for as compared to what the rest of society is willing to accommodate. And even if my situation is incredibly inconvenient to me, how do I weigh it against the needs of another person whose concerns are potentially greater than my own?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I think you might’ve just answered your original question.

[–] MossBear 9 points 1 year ago

This can be considered a micro-fuss for starters.