Ask Lemmy

27061 readers

2907 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected]

Rules: (interactive)

1) Be nice and; have fun

Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them

2) All posts must end with a '?'

This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?

3) No spam

Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.

4) NSFW is okay, within reason

Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].

5) This is not a support community.

It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.

Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Could one really really smart person eventually recreate all technological advancements granted immortality? (self.asklemmy)

submitted 1 year ago by 6mementomori to c/asklemmy

60 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Let's say we left one single very smart guy (not necessarily with the knowledge: they may be able to understand hard stuff when taught it, but not know it already) alone on a copy of the earth. That person is also immortal. Could that person, by themselves, gain back all knowledge, maybe also experimental, or even surpass that is already available to us right now, before the planet gets inevitably engulfed by a sun turning red giant?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] the_dopamine_fiend 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/505:_A_Bunch_of_Rocks

It can be hard to explain, but basically each row of rocks is a line of input/computation/output not unlike the binary code that flows through the circuits of a processor. It's a different representation of the same kind of work your device is doing right now. And, as you might think, waaaaaay slower.

[–] feedum_sneedson 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, what is slower though. Presumably they mean the rate at which the guy lays the stones, otherwise there's nothing changing over time. It would just be a record.

[–] the_dopamine_fiend 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right. Think of Cueball laying stones as a CPU, and the rate at which he can finish laying a row and return to the beginning as his clock speed.

[–] feedum_sneedson 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Very long lines, then.

[–] the_dopamine_fiend 1 points 1 year ago

Mind-bogglingly long!