politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
If you want to call someone a leech don't leech on them yourself. Use mastodon.
Yes, use a niche platform where you can preach to the choir of 10 people, rather than the place where you might influence millions of views. Great suggestion!
She already has million of followers on meta and x, creating a mastodon account and move people there would be one of the best actions they could take
What the fuck is Mastodon!
I would never recommend Twitter to normal people, but she's a politician, she has to go where the people are.
I would argue she should be encouraging people to use Mastodon, but the fact is most people currently on Fediverse either already agree with her positions or think she's "lib controlled opposition."
A politician is not a salesman.
There are no excuses to not even have a mastodon account. If you have million of followers encouraging them to move off centralized and proprietary social networks is one of the greatest actions you can take.
JFC, just stop. You gonna hurt yourself in your confusion.
A politician is literally a sales person.
They are literally selling their political vision to their voters.
It's really difficult to say something so stupid in such a smug way, but you pulled it off.
Yea that got me laughing
No one would notice if she posted on Mastodon, it's just not big enough for news sources to check on regularly. This article literally wouldn't exist.
Mastodon has plenty of users who would notice. The Millions of followers she has on x and meta would also learn of mastodon
The ones that wouldn't see a post on Mastadon? Even if an article was made about a Masta post, which it wouldn't be, only a small fraction of her X followers would see that article. Far less than the existing followers she already has.
Look, you're being intentional obtuse but I understand way. I wish more people would use defederated platforms too, but that doesn't chang Le the fact that a politician has am existing way of mass communication. Being mad at her for using it is at best, unproductive.
Not only she's not using it she's not even bothering creating an account. 5 minutes to create an account and they are not even bothering doing it, do your own conclusions.
She is on Bluesky which is better than X by a country mile. Politicians have to go where users are because that’s how marketing works.
You are confusing politics with marketing
Having a bluesky account and not a mastodon one makes you even more sus
Politics is a game my friend and marketing your politics is part of it. Next time say ‘suspicious’ or I won’t take you seriously.
How is she leeching
Maybe she doesn't seed?
There's an inappropriate joke hiding in there... somewhere.
Apparently using corporate social media is leeching.