this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2025
255 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19883 readers
4551 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
255
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by MicroWave to c/politics
 

Summary

The Trump administration emailed air traffic controllers urging them to quit and accept buyouts 24 hours after a fatal Reagan plane crash.

At 8:30 p.m. Thursday, the email urged federal employees to pursue private-sector jobs, offering pay incentives and vacation benefits while on government payroll.

This program contradicts established rules by allowing second employment, sparking union concerns about losing experienced personnel amid an air traffic controller shortage.

Trump blamed previous administrations for safety issues and misrepresented FAA standards, intensifying culture wars as officials remain uncertain about the buyout program's future.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SinningStromgald 67 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Replacing them will take months at a minimum. The FAA website says it takes 1-3yrs on the job to be certified after months of training. Who will direct air traffic if a large number take the deal? Especially with current shortage. How will this improve air safety? How is this "good" in any way, shape or form?

[–] [email protected] 68 points 6 days ago (4 children)

It’s not good, he’s intentionally breaking things for some reason. A lot of things. A distressing number of things.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 6 days ago (2 children)

“…for some reason…”

The reason is the same as all fascist takeovers. The coup works slowly, then suddenly. We are in the acceleration phase, it’s ramping up, just as they said it would in the Project 2025 documents.

I REPEAT: THIS WAS ALL ANNOUNCED BEFOREHAND. Plus, history explains.

The script is to combine a shock and awe campaign of massive change on so many fronts that no one could possibly resist them all, and to demoralize and deflate opposition.

Once this phase is complete, the power thieves will have sufficiently infiltrated the monopoly on violence (military and policing management) and the bureaucratic and technocratic key elements will be gutted or loyalized, so that a full coup can occur. Full control of media, a massive apparatus of repression and surveillance, and a hot mess of mistrust throughout society.

Interpersonal and community relations will be broken and replaced by dependency on authority for guidance and morality and information. Rights will be crushed and perverted. Power and money will only flow to the top, and poverty will become the norm.

US international influence will contract and enemies will be constructed. Blame Canada.

Just a warning though, when you folks are finally conscripted to invade northwards, we have a lot of methods and welcoming gifts to make it regrettable, and people here are getting prepared. I’d dodge the draft, when it comes, if I were you.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Just a warning though, when you folks are finally conscripted to invade northwards, we have a lot of methods and welcoming gifts to make it regrettable, and people here are getting prepared. I’d dodge the draft, when it comes, if I were you.

Many of us would rather fight for y'all. Especially those at the coasts

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I really don't like people pointing to things like the fall of the Roman, Spanish, and Weimar Republics because it not only plays a defeatist narrative, it's just myopic.

America is not any of those states, and we aren't in those times. Yes there are similarities, especially because the fascists are deliberately playing from their playbooks, but if you get trapped into thinking only about what happened then and there you miss some of what is happening here and now.

Trump is wildly unpopular amongst half the country. A genuine resistance has all the gas it will ever need, when he crosses the line we need to be ready to fight.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I get what you're saying, but personally, as a queer Hispanic transwoman, I've spent over 2 decades of my life fighting for my right to exist only to be rewarded with this. I'm done fighting for the US, no one actually gives a shit about us. I'm catching the next metaphorical train out of here.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Perfectly valid. At least send some socks to the resistance though.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Just a warning though, when you folks are finally conscripted to invade northwards, we have a lot of methods and welcoming gifts to make it regrettable, and people here are getting prepared. I’d dodge the draft, when it comes, if I were you.

Canada should do what Ukraine did and setup a surrender hotline.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

Can we preemptively surrender?

[–] [email protected] 43 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

This was the Nazi playbook in the 1930s .... cause widespread chaos and disruption throughout the country. Everything breaks down and becomes lawless and disorganized, so government is forced to step in and impose a heavy handed authoritarian control of everything to save the nation.

They set the fire, blame someone (anyone), then put out the fire themselves and push the message that they saved everyone from the fire. Blast the message over and over again and drown out any dissent or opposition and gain complete control of everything.

Then every professional, logical thinking individual, academic, politician, highly trained person in the land turns a blind eye and writes a book about it all 50 years from now with criticisms as to how everyone could be so deluded as to fall for the trap a second time.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Except now they have nuclear weapons. The world is done for. Thanks ~~obama~~ american citizens.

[–] GladiusB 1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

How is Obama responsible for some asshole's behavior?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

"Thanks Obama" was a meme used by people to bring attention to the fact that Obama was regularly blamed for things he had nothing to do with. Some really stupid people went so far as to talk about Obama's poor response to 9/11. So people started to just satirically say "Thanks Obama" basically indicating that blaming Obama lacked all meaning and credibility.

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/thanks-obama

[–] GladiusB 1 points 6 days ago

I understand the meme. It was a bit obtuse on the execution end for me.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That wasn’t being suggested

[–] GladiusB 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Then why is it struck through?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Because "thanks Obama" is an Obama era presidency meme that the man himself even used satirically.

For more information, google "thanks Obama".

[–] GladiusB 2 points 6 days ago

I know the meme. It did not fit the format in the response.

[–] brucethemoose 14 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Because Trump drinks his own kool aid. He really, actually thinks these controllers are useless because of DEI, and he trusts fox over his own presidential information feed.

This is a peculiar thing to me. Many autocratic regimes are seem more self aware.

[–] krimson 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Intentional, or just an idiot. I mean the man is not smart at all. Look at what he has said and done in the past. He also sucked as a businessman, contrary to popular belief.

I'm not worried there is some masterplan here, just worried those 4 years will go by too slowly.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago

There is a master plan, it's just that trump isn't the one that thought it up. He's not doing this alone, there's a lot of people in on it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

I fully believe Trump to be an idiot, unfortunately his handlers are not.

[–] Frozengyro 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They later came out and said they aren't eligible for this deal. It was a mass email to every gov employee.

[–] SinningStromgald 5 points 6 days ago

So re-send of the last one?