this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
821 points (96.3% liked)

World News

38750 readers
2517 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] danc4498 24 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I think the conservatives don’t disagree that climate change is real, they disagree that humans are responsible. To them it’s things like El Niño or solar activity.

[–] FlyingSquid 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And they're wrong according to virtually every person who actually studies the climate for a living, so they might as well pretend it's made up.

And it's stupid anyway. You might be able to deny human-caused climate change, but you can't deny smog and pollution. Greener energy sources mean less smog and pollution. Why isn't that a good thing to them?

[–] chiliedogg 15 points 1 year ago

It's a fundamental lack of understanding of math and science.

There's a video going around conservative circles talking about how CO2 only makes up .04 percent of the atmosphere, and therefore even if it were doubled it would be less than 1/1000th of the atmosphere, so it's not worth worrying about.

I tried to explain to my father that that's exactly why we're able to have such an impact. They don't understand that we're able to make a much larger relative impact on CO2 versus Nitrogen and Oxygen and therefore a larger impact on global temperatures.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It's actually a spectrum of disavowal of responsibility:

  • It's not happening.
  • Even if it is happening, it's not our fault.
  • Even if it is our fault, there is nothing we can do.
  • Even if there is something we can do, it's too late to do anything.

It's just that the first stage (denialism) is starting to become untenable.

[–] Syd 4 points 1 year ago
  • Even if it isn't too late to do something it's the others that should do it
  • Even if we are the ones that should do something, it's down to everyone individually so no job for the politicians
  • Even if it is down to the state, sorry it's too expensive.
[–] donnachaidh 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah yes, the standard Foreign Office response in a time of crisis. The tactic does not get old.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

THANK YOU! I was trying to remember where my brain dug this up from and I couldn't pinpoint it.

  • Bernard Woolley : What if the Prime Minister insists we help them?
  • Sir Humphrey Appleby : Then we follow the four-stage strategy.
  • Bernard Woolley : What's that?
  • Sir Richard Wharton : Standard Foreign Office response in a time of crisis.
  • Sir Richard Wharton : In stage one we say nothing is going to happen.
  • Sir Humphrey Appleby : Stage two, we say something may be about to happen, but we should do nothing about it.
  • Sir Richard Wharton : In stage three, we say that maybe we should do something about it, but there's nothing we can do.
  • Sir Humphrey Appleby : Stage four, we say maybe there was something we could have done, but it's too late now.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0751831/characters/nm0001329

[–] Upgrade2754 3 points 1 year ago

The major oil companies acknowledged climate change is a major threat and they are primarily responsible for it decades ago