It's the prog-lib equivalent of woke. It's used dismiss leftists with out engaging with our arguments. The term has lite ideological or argumentative use.

[–] Darorad 34 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Libs use it that way, actual leftists use it to describe fascists that think they're on the left and like red flags.

[+] StalinsMoustache 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

[deleted]

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If you're in a position where you can freely oppress the capitalist class then you've already supplanted them and become the capitalist class.

[–] phthalocyanin 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

radical solidarity, mutual aid, armed community defense. none of these require the state apparatus.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

Without a state to enforce environmental regulations, how do you intend to defend your community from pollution? By attacking the polluters with guns? They have guns, too. Probably more guns than you do, since pollution is so profitable.

Without a state to defend against invasion, what's going to stop some other country from marching in and enslaving you? Small arms won't protect you from a modern military; only a modern military of your own will, and without a state, who will command it?

Without a state to enforce mutual aid, what's going to stop others from withholding it while taking yours? By the expectation that no one will be so greedy as to withhold needed aid? Then your proposed system will fail almost immediately. By some sort of aid credit that groups of people exchange equally in order to ensure that aid given equals aid received? Congratulations, you have invented capitalism.

The state apparatus exists for a reason. It has of course been abused, but we can't simply get rid of it and expect everything to be fine, or else we'd have already gotten rid of it a long time ago.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

There won't be a capitalist class when their assets are seized.