No Stupid Questions
No such thing. Ask away!
!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.
All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.
Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.
If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.
Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.
If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.
Credits
Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!
The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!
view the rest of the comments
No and not for the reason you'd expect:
To open an account, OnlyFans requires you to do social media and prove that your social media accounts are yours, and of course they require you to hand over your real identity with your real ID card or passport and a selfie.
This is beyond dystopian. You have to be suicidal from a privacy standpoint to do OnlyFans.
You’ve probably provided ID at every job you’ve ever had. This is to establish legal residency and that you are of working age. I know OF is not a 9 to 5 job but money is exchanged and I don’t see why this is so dystopian, especially given the extra sensitivity around age.
I have no issue with providing ID. I take issue with them requiring me to provide social media credentials. If you don't do social media - and especially if you don't do Facebook in particular - no OnlyFans for you.
Do you find this normal?
I don't.
Okay you actually spent more words on ID and real identity than socials so that did seem to be an objection.
Privacy is the concern you cited. If so, why would you be worried about Facebook and not be worried about real ID?
I’m just trying to understand this clearly - setting aside hyperbole words like dystopian and questions about what I find normal.
Well, I'm not a fan of any for-profit asking for my ID. But this is an outfit for sex workers and I'm a reasonable man, so I understand the legal need for them to ask me to provide strong proof of my identity, simply to comply with the law.
But why should they go any further than what the law requires them to do?
There are very valid reasons to have a private Facebook and keep it totally separate from your OnlyFans gig. You may have had your Facebook account for years or decades, you interact with your friends and family with it, you know your employer - or your next employer's headhunter - will check it out. It needs to be squeaky clean and "normal".
And on the side, you're Mistress Jeanne queen of the dominatrix on OnlyFans: you absolutely DON'T want anybody to know you're Mistress Jeanne for obvious reasons.
OnlyFans destroys this separation. They know who you are (by law) and they force you to tell them who you present yourself as on Facebook - in case you didn't use quite the same name, which is very common with trans people for example - and they obviously know who you are and what you do on their platform.
Why do you think they require you to disclose your social media avatars? To aggregate the information and sell it of course. It's completely obvious they're building a database of fully deanonymized sex workers, and that has to be worth a pretty penny on the nauseating data brokers' market.
If you don't care about privacy, you use your real name everywhere or you don't care that Big Data knows everything about you, including your not-so-savory activities, this is of no concern to you. But most people do stuff they want to keep secret, or hidden, or at least compartmentalized away from their ordinary life and OnlyFan's requirements are all shades of terrible for that basic right to privacy.
Well, I did think of a reason and it’s not for selling your data. This was in the back of my mind but I didn’t know how to put it into words.
From your perspective, you’re a private individual who wants to display a little ass for coin, all on the up and up. And how dare they ask invasive questions.
But you do have to remember that ANY community driven site has abuse problems all the time, let alone one where sex workers are plying their trade. So in my mind, they are asking for FB so they can say “keep it real - we know who you are.”
On the one hand this is dumb and implies a threat. On other hand their site would immediately fly downhill and get shut down if everything there could be done with total anonymity.
Be that as it may, it's still unacceptable.
To me anyway.
And it fully qualifies as dystopian in my opinion.
Okay. You have a rather low bar for dystopia.
Indeed I do. I'm gen-X 🙂 This sort of shit was unheard of - and unthinkable - when I grew up. This is everybody's normal today but it sure ain't mine.
I agree I can’t think of any good reason to require Facebook account. But it seems pretty easy to just tell them you never had an account before and create a dummy one. That’s probably what a lot of people have to anyway since no one uses FB anymore.
If it turns you off, I get it. If you want to protect your privacy better, I get that too, though OF doesn’t seem like a vehicle for increasing one’s privacy under any circumstances. The whole “dystopian” thing was a bit much though.
That doesn't work. They don't accept that. They tell you "Sorry but you need a solid social media presence, with an old account full of actual content." No social media, no OnlyFans. They literally tell you that when you send them a support email asking why your application was rejected.
I find it hard to believe that all the GenZ ladies there have extensive Facebook accounts.
They accept other forms of social media presence of course - although only a select few types. But when I looked into this 2 or 3 years ago, they were absolutely biased towards you preferentially having a Facebook account. And they literally told me they actively worked with Facebook, hence the bias - and if you don't find them outright admitting this alarming, I don't know what does.
I'm just telling you what they told me.
That's actually fucking ridiculous. But I guess if you're willing to put your asshole and face together on the Internet, you're probably not to concerned about these extra steps.
You miss the point.
What if you want to have a Facebook with the name "Joe Smith" and an OnlyFans with the name "Queen Georgina"? Even if your OnlyFans shows your face - which isn't a requirement by the way - it's not your real name. And you may not want to put your face or your real name on your Facebook at all, and keep the two completely separate.
OnlyFans basically destroy the separation between your accounts and links both with your real identity, your real government-issued ID number or SSN. And they collaborate very closely with Facebook in case you didn't know. I know that because I asked them.
As for asshole pictures, as far as I know, asshole recognition technology isn't as developed as facial recognition technology yet.
wait really? put me back in the fuck no camp then
"As for asshole pictures, as far as I know, asshole recognition technology isn't as developed as facial recognition technology yet."
Fecal recognition technology.
They're developing a toilet that can recognize people based on unique asshole prints and track, analyze, and store data on your waste on the cloud. It's a privacy nightmare I didn't think I needed to worry about. https://futurism.com/neoscope/scientists-toilet-identifies-butthole
Nope, this isn't real, I'm high as balls and back a decade ago when AdultSwim did the SmartPipe joke informercial, I'm just hallucinacting being in 2025.
Yep.
Just really high right now, certainly not living in the pedophile toilet future timeline.
I immediately was like "smart pipe!" No fuckin' way.
We must install live stream cameras in all our toilets, for the sake of national security
It may save lives one day.
What point do you think that I am missing? I was making a half-joke saying that people on Onlyfans probably aren't super into privacy measures.
Facebook doesn't allow you to not show your face
https://youtu.be/DJklHwoYgBQ
Im going to assume OnlyFans doesn't do that because they want to. They'd likely be harassed by government if they didn't.
Pornhub had to remove all unverified videos (which was most of their videos) and now anyone who uploads must follow similar rules that OnlyFans has. Pornhub posted an announcement saying they reported 118 instances of child abuse materials while Facebook reported 84,000,000 but that somehow they're the ones being threatened to be shutdown unless they implement more rules.
I think it has to do with women being trafficked into cam service.
Only partially.
They don't legally have to require you to do social media. All they're legally required to do is to verify that you're a consenting adult. In that respect, I get that they require a form of ID and a photo.
But the social media stuff is something they pretend to require to add an extra layer of legitimacy to your account, and make extra-sure you're not a fraud. It's of course complete bullshit. They only do this to collect data.
And don't think for a second you can open an empty Facebook account and tell them "Here's my social media account": they want an old account with lots of real activity. And only certain types social media accounts are accepted. In fact, they're very heavily biased towards you having a Facebook account, and it's a lot more difficult to validate your OnlyFans account with anything other than a Facebook account.
They're in cahoots with Facebook on the social media verification scam. I believe a good portion of their revenue stream is deanonymizing sex workers and selling their data.
What about Fansly?
You're right!
If I remember correctly the pressure came from credit card companies and not any government.
I'd sell a lot more than that for riches.
It's to keep kids off the website and even with all that, there's already been cases. I think they dont do enough tbh.
Fortunately some places have zero knowledge proofs where you can prove you're of age without giving your identity
Doesn’t that just hand the privacy issue over to another company?
If by company you mean the government, yes. But they already have your info by necessity
They need all that to be able to give you your money.
It's how you get paid.
They don't need to know under which name I access Facebook to pay me.
It's not like you're using your personal social accounts for this stuff.
You're not going to want your friends and family anywhere near it.
Only Fans want to know your public social accounts. The ones that are part of your "Brand", that would drive your "Business". That's what matters.
If you're worried about privacy on those accounts, you're doing it all wrong.
You have to. Facebook doesn't allow you to have multiple accounts. If they suspect otherwise (even if they're wrong), they'll just delete your account
And you don't need to provide them with it, either. A friend of mine does OF, and has had no such requirement to verify her social media. Unless this is a new requirement that existing members aren't obligated to go through, or required for a specific feature of the OF platform, then I believe providing them that info is otherwise optional.