this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
477 points (99.0% liked)

196

16803 readers
3419 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Ah yes, the well known i5.90689059561

Edit: i5.90689059560851852932405837343720668462464580071706167251050905035703300440298377837242021827745839719063803418530941917054164942532445171041739

[–] whostosay 10 points 5 days ago

Is this what over-clocking is?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

OK, I am dumb. Can you explain what that is?

[–] Tyfud 24 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm not OP, but my guess is they're referring to the Intel math bug that some i5's had. I'm struggling to track it down, but it's basically an issue with doing long division where the floating point math would produce a very wrong result.

You can see more here at least for the bug/issue that existed in the 90's here

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I’m not actually, just that a binary integer that overflows at 60 couldn’t exist, hence the 5.907 whatever bit length

[–] Tyfud 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

oh, that's actually clever. And I'm saying that as a software engineer. I missed that possibility :)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

I should have phrased it differently, like “Ah yes, the well known 5.9068905956 bit integer.” But thanks