this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
1526 points (97.8% liked)

Antiwork

4104 readers
6 users here now

Date Created: June 21, 2023

This community supports labor, with an aspiration for it to cease to be required to live our lives. Members of this community want to end work, are curious about ending work, want to get the most out of a work-free life, want more information on anti-work ideas and/or want personal help with their own jobs/work-related struggles.

Anti-Work Library πŸ“š
Essential Reads

Start here! Some of the more talked-about essays on the topic.

c/Antiwork Rules

Tap or click to expand

1. Server Main Rules


The main rules of the server will be enforced stringently. https://lemmy.world/


2. No spam or reposts + limit off topic comments


Spamming posts will be removed. Reposts will be removed with the exception of a repost becoming the main hub for discussion on that topic.

Off topic comments that do not pertain to the post at hand may be removed if it is deemed they contribute nothing and/or foster hostility at users. This mostly applies to political and religious debate, but can be applied to other things at the mod’s discretion.


3. Post must have Antiwork/ Work Reform explicitly involved


Post must have Antiwork/Work Reform explicitly involved in some capacity. This can be talking about antiwork, work reform, laws, and ext.


4. Educate don’t attack


No mocking, demeaning, flamebaiting, purposeful antagonizing, trolling, hateful language, false accusation or allegation, or backseat moderating is allowed. Don’t resort to ad hominem attacks against another user or insult other people, examples of violations would be going after the person rather than the stance they take.

If we feel the comment is uncalled for we will remove it. Stay civil and there won’t be problems.


5. No Advertising


Under no circumstance are you allowed to promote or advertise any product or service


6. No factually misleading information


Content that makes claims or implications that can be proven false or misleading will be removed.


7. Headlines


If the title of the post isn’t an original title of the article then the first thing in the body of the post should be an original title written in this format β€œOriginal title: {title here}”.


8. Staff Discretion


Staff can take disciplinary action on offenses not listed in the rules when a community member's actions or general conduct creates a negative experience for another player and/or the community.

It is impossible to list every example or variation of the rules. It is also impossible to word everything perfectly. Players are expected to understand the intent of the rules and not attempt to "toe the line" or use loopholes to get around the intent of the rule.


9. No posting links to Twitter/X or Meta owned properties


Social Media products such as Twitter/X and Meta Properties (e.g. Facebook, Instagram, Threads) are known low quality information sources - they actively spread misinformation without sufficient moderation, hate speech. These platforms each have billionaire owners working actively to eliminate labor protections through direct action, lobbying, performative large scale layoffs and attacks on institutions that enforce labor law.

You are not encouraged to do so, but you may post screenshots from these sites IF THE INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE ON ANOTHER VALID PLATFORM. Screenshots must include info to support a relevant conversation within this community and must show a VISIBLE time/date stamp for posterity. If you are caught manipulating content of a screenshot, your post will be removed and you will receive an indefinite ban from this community at the discretion of the moderator(s)

No pass through/archive services are allowed as they potentially feed traffic back to these services, directly or indirectly (e.g. Services like Xcancel or Nitter)



Antiwork Suggested Communities

c/[email protected]


Server status for big servers http://lemmy-status.org/

Active stats from all Antiwork instances

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 219 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Whenever he gets cheers and applause in a news comedy show, the host always looks uncomfortable. You can almost see the leash of their corporate overlords being tugged.

[–] pyre 174 points 1 month ago (8 children)

I mean, it's not just that. it's legal liability. part of the reason they charged him with terrorism is to tie any show of support to a crime as well. supporting him is like supporting al-qaeda now. so I ask you, DO YOU CONDEMN HUMMUS? DO YOU CONDOM MORDOR OF CEOS?

[–] [email protected] 101 points 1 month ago (2 children)

All it did was show a lot of people what bullshit a charge of "terrorism" is.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 month ago (3 children)

For the longest time, people thought "terrorism" meant "very evil," so now that someone who isn't evil is being labeled a terrorist, they are upset.

In reality, if you try to change politics with violence against a civilian, you are a terrorist.

"One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter."

[–] WoodScientist 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That's not what the law in NY actually says. It's not merely that you're trying to change government policy through violence. It's that you're trying to do it through intimidating government employees. The prosecutor screwed the pooch on this one. Luigi didn't actually meet the terrorism modifier requirements in NY. At least that's what I got from Legal Eagle.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Interesting. I thought his terrorism charges were the federal ones?

Either way this will be a hell of a case.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

No he got NY terrorism charges and murder charges in NY and federally and then federal gun charges iirc

[–] Serinus 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As a side note, legal eagle is available on nebula.tv with no ads. I think the first episode is free, and then the service is $36/year, with more of that going to who you watch.

[–] WoodScientist 2 points 1 month ago

Yup! I've long been a Nebula subscriber.

[–] glimse 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hopefully it's hard to prove that his intent was change and not revenge

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You don't engrave a message on casings unless you're sending a message to the living.

[–] glimse 4 points 1 month ago (7 children)

That's an incredibly flimsy argument. People have been writing messages on ammo since ammo existed. There's not even an established pattern of terrorists writing on ammo - they're more likely to claim credit for an attack after the fact and include their message there.

Those were words for him. Deny and defend this, mother fucker.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] AnyOldName3 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The company's other employees are, at time of writing, still living, so sending a message to the living doesn't mean it's not solely revenge.

[–] SmackemWittadic 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm still like 100% sure that this isn't the same guy in the pictures taken on the crime scene, given that literally ALL THEY HAVE TO GO BY is that his form of dress was the same.

[–] AnyOldName3 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think it's entirely plausible that it's the same guy, but he was tracked down through illegal means and the tip-off was faked. If so, it's reasonable to think that some or all of the physical evidence was planted in order to have something that would be admissible. If evidence was potentially planted, though, it can't be used as the basis for a guilty verdict, so even if Mangione did do it, there might not be enough evidence for a conviction.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You know. I’ve been having a hard time with both the official story and the that’s not the real shooter theory.

Your theory is a third one I haven’t thought of before. He is the shooter but they faked how they found him to protect their secret surveillance capabilities from being reported on. Maybe illegal maybe not, but probably tech they don’t want the public knowing about.

This actually sounds most plausible to me.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, this country was founded by terrorists.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think they'd technically be classified as insurgents/rebels because they mostly/exclusively fired upon the military as far as I know.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

as far as I know.

Well, it's time to brush up a bit before commenting, then, huh?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

School shooters should be getting hit with terrorism charges

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

It certainly causes more terror, but mostly just with the rabble, not the ultra wealthy who actually matter.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Also, lets not forget who will be president soon.. Trump and his fellows have hinted at going after fake news media before. Going after terrorism supporting fake news media is even easier.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Also GOP: "We are all domestic terrorists"

[–] Bassman1805 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

For those who have forgotten, this is an actual quote from the republican party.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/cpac-banner-domestic-terrorists/

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

The venn diagram of Lemmy users and people who aren't aware of that image are a circle here on earth and another circle in low orbit of Sedna.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Holy shit America is becoming united under the banner bof domestic terrorism. I wholeheartedly approve. If the ruling class isn't pissing themselves we haven't gone far enough yet. They should fear We the people.

[–] WoodScientist 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It is perfectly legal to advocate for illegal activity. The first amendment has broad protections for this. SCOTUS has ruled on this even recently. You need to be able to advocate for illegal activity if you want people to have any chance to change the law.

It is perfectly legal to come right out on national television and say, "Luigi did nothing wrong. The president and governor should pardon him, and the mayor of NYC should throw him a parade."

[–] pyre 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

lol... those who remember the 2000s know that's all out the window if the government says anything is terrorism.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago

The right to free speech and the right to peaceably assemble hasn't been respected at any point during US history.

Not immediately after the country was formed when they signed the sedition act into law.

Not while people were protesting for abolitionism.

Not while people were protesting for women's suffrage.

Not while people held demonstrations while on strike.

Not during the cold war and red scare.

Not during the civil rights movement.

Not during the George Floyd protests.

They're not going to start now.

[–] RamenJunkie 3 points 1 month ago

Like the incoming Christo Gestapo crew will give a shit about that when they start rounding up potential "wrong thinkers"

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wait, "condom" and "mordor"??!? What the hell sub is this??!!

[–] kautau 24 points 1 month ago
[–] Dragonborn3810 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yes, I do condom mordor of ceos

[–] pyre 3 points 1 month ago

OH SO YOU SUPPORT HUMMUS THE SILENCE SPEAKS VOLUMES

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

But how do you feel about hummus?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Didn't Hillary Clinton stated in one of those leaked mails that AQ was with the US or something?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Ok then, sure, make the average person a terrorist. That will be fun!

[–] Donkter 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's also just the purview of the liberal elite. So rich and far removed from society they think murdering someone makes you evil and there's never any reason to do it.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Meanwhile our media is absolutely jam packed with freedom fighters and underdogs and man against the system.. ultra gore.

So like idk what message the elites have been getting out of the media but the really popular stuff is always the stuff that speaks to the masses.. and feels relatable.

So sitcoms and… horror dystopia, yep.

[–] YarHarSuperstar 12 points 1 month ago

They obviously don't have a problem with murder (they have a murder problem!) unless it's one of them receiving the murdering

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Not all "news comedy", FWIW β€” though I think you were referring to Faux "News", Twatter, FB, MSNBC, et al.

That's not the expression in those moments. Take another, longer look.