this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
37 points (64.6% liked)

196

16704 readers
2286 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Using ableist language as insults is always bad, even if the words seem innocuous. Some may reference the "euphemism treadmill" to try to justify their behavior, but it's crucial to understand that the treadmill is merely a linguistic observation. It does not exist to normalize ableist behavior.

what is the euphemism treadmill for those who dont want to google

more reading if bored

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Neurodivergent isn’t an insult…

[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

With that theory, any word could become an insult.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Bingo. I assumed more people understood this, so I apologize for not communicating clearly. Any word can become an insult—with the right people in control. What’s particularly hurtful is seeing words that marginalized or oppressed groups use to describe their own experiences being co-opted and turned into insults, reinforcing their otherness.

It happened with “retard,” as with “idiot,” and so many others. Recently, I’ve seen it happen with more niche phrases (look up “is X acoustic” if you’re unfamiliar). Just the other day, I made a comment that I could see two perspectives on a matter. Instead of simply calling me wrong, someone said, “You must be neurodivergent, you’re so gullible.” In that context, “neurodivergent” was clearly being used as a stand-in for the r-slur.

To be clear, I am not against any language. I’m against the weaponizing of language.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

👍🏻

What’s interesting about the word retard specifically is it’s still used as a technical term that has nothing to do with developmental disabilities - for example, fire retardant - to slow/stop something.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 hours ago

right, i mean thats just kind of a side effect of language existing

a similar concept appears in the terms “dumbwaiter,” “dumbfounded,” “dumbstruck” wherein “dumb” literally just meant mechanical/nonspeaking, and had none of the other implications of disability-related muteness it has now.

obviously “dumb” carries a lot less weight these days than the r slur, but the existence of etymologically related terms doesn’t give an “out” to people using them for offense and denigration in either case

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago

That's the attitude one would expect from such a high class individual.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

"Cisgender" isn't an insult either, but that doesn't stop Elon Musk and his flunkies from treating it as such.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (4 children)

correct, it’s not (or shouldn’t be), but it’s being used as one, especially recently!

precontext: i said i could see both sides of some non-important debate. something about whether a community mod should be heavy or light with bans, and i was like, “well it depends on what the motivations and needs are.”

their response to that?

in this post i hope to call attention to the same destructive processes happening to “neurodiverse” as to all the other terms. particularly i want to call out the ableist motivations behind it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can use gay, homosexual, homo habilis as insults

That doesnt make these words bad

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

precisely? never said otherwise :) to quote another person right in this thread whom i agree with:

It’s an insult because of intent, not because of the word itself, though.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's an insult because of intent, not because of the word itself, though.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

oh absolutely :) would never disagree with you here 💯💯💯

[–] Manifish_Destiny 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah and I could call you a wet blanket for not realizing words can be used however the fuck you want.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

fully agree, as i have said here and here.

unfortunately, blocked for being mean about it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Without the context it doesn’t come off as insulting.