this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2024
345 points (96.7% liked)

News

23426 readers
5095 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

In response to Donald Trump’s re-election, some same-sex couples, like Ben Nelson and Adam Weinberger, are accelerating plans to marry, fearing potential rollbacks of LGBTQ rights.

Concerns stem from the Supreme Court’s 2022 overturning of Roe v. Wade and past statements from conservative justices suggesting interest in revisiting the 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges ruling that legalized same-sex marriage.

While the Respect for Marriage Act offers federal safeguards, uncertainty persists.

LGBTQ-friendly businesses are stepping up to support couples, but fears of broader restrictions, including on parenting options, remain widespread among the community.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 57 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (5 children)

I wonder what the chances are that the coming administration invalidate such marriages, probably on some dumb Christian nationalist grounds

[–] [email protected] 49 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Supreme Court has already signaled that gay marriage is on the chopping block.

[–] x00z 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Weren't they against sharia law?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 hours ago

Only if you call it that.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

I wonder how this would work with their anti-trans initiatives. If a transwoman tried to marry her girlfriend, would it technically be legal under their backwards laws?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 hours ago

No, they see us as criminals and will deny every right they can, marriage, public service, equal treatment under the law, medical insurance/medication, freedom of association, speech, and even our right to exist. The point is to criminalize and erase our existence from public life.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 11 hours ago

Logically yes, but they are not bound by logic.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 12 hours ago

Anything is possible, but it would be far more difficult to invalidate existing marriages than prevent new ones. Which is exactly why couples are rushing to get it done now.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It's already happening in Italy, so there's no reason to believe the GOP would hold back.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Italy has never recognized same-sex marriage.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Sorry, Captain Pedantic — they have same-sex unions (and recently banned travel for surrogacy specifically for gay couples)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

It’s not pedantic when it’s two different things.

[–] bitchkat 2 points 10 hours ago

No one should bet against it.