this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
259 points (72.4% liked)

politics

19248 readers
2174 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Kamala Harris’s political skills have transformed a potentially disastrous 2024 presidential election into a competitive race.

Despite initial skepticism and a challenging campaign, Harris has improved her public image and closed the gap with Trump on key issues. Since Biden stepped aside in July and endorsed her, she has shifted from an unpopular vice president to a viable candidate, even matching Trump in polls on economic issues.

Her leadership has given Democrats a chance to prevent a Trump landslide and halt the rise of American authoritarianism.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pjwestin 18 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Are you fucking kidding? This campaign has been a fucking train wreck. There was genuine excitement behind her candidacy when Biden stepped down, and Walz actually generated even more enthusiasm. Since then, she has spent every moment of the campaign killing that energy. She alienated Muslim and Arab voters by refusing to allow a Palestinian speaker at the DNC. She's alienated her progressive base by campaigning with Liz Cheney and Laura Bush to court moderate Republicans. They're literally rerunning the 2016 playbook and saying, "Yeah, but this time I've got a good feeling about it!"

I hope she wins, and if you're reading this and you haven't voted yet, please just vote for her, especially if you live in a swing state. But Jesus Fucking Christ, let's not pretend she'd even have a shot of winning if she wasn't up against a facist rapist.

[–] Snowclone 7 points 1 month ago

Yeah trying to appeal to conservatives didn't work for Hillary and I have no idea why they think it would have worked now. You aren't convincing the cult to un-cult, this should have been a referendum on Roe v. Wade and a litigation of Trump's failures in every decision he made, dancing on every issue to see if not offending christo-fascists would pull them to the center is insane.

[–] Resonosity 7 points 1 month ago

Thank you for bringing attention to the incompetence of Kamala's campaign. She and her campaign at one point even had to silence Tim Walz for his believes because they went against the platform.

Then the race after Republicans by uniting with the Cheneys just cucked them so hard.

Tim Walz was the key to this campaign's victory. And Kamala dropped the ball.

[–] Fosheze 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Exactly, Harris has been mag dumping into her own feet on the final stretch to make this as close of a race as it is. It's like she's desperate to not win by too much. My inner conspiracy theorist is wondering if that's not actually the case. If harris won by a landslide then that would neuter trump and the far right as a threat. That would mean the DNC couldn't keep using them to push corporate moderates through by just saying "vote us or get the fash again". But if the DNC just barely wins then they can keep using trump and those like him as a threat.

[–] partial_accumen 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

She’s alienated her progressive base by campaigning with Liz Cheney and Laura Bush to court moderate Republicans. They’re literally rerunning the 2016 playbook and saying, “Yeah, but this time I’ve got a good feeling about it!”

You missed the point of those actions. She's campaigning with Cheney and Bush to court women Republicans. Its a good strategy. My guess, if Harris wins it will be largely thanks to women stepping up in the voting booth.

[–] pjwestin 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, I get the strategy. It's just bad. If abortion is your deciding issue, you're going to vote for Harris. Suburban women may very well be the key to this election, I just don't think that they were waiting for someone to give them permission to vote for Harris. I especially don't think that any of them who might have gone for Trump would be swayed by anyone with the last name Cheney or Bush.

Also, the assumption had to have been that they could court these conservative women safely because progressive groups would turn out to defeat Trump. I think that's a very dangerous gamble, especially without doing something to energize progressives. Breaking with Biden on Gaza, even just a little, would have done a lot, but they decided against that. I'm afraid that they've demoralized a large number of their core voting groups to court a small number of conservatives.

[–] draneceusrex 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Likely voters is the key. The Never Trump crowd is part of the "likely voters" crowd. If the far-left voted, then Bernie would probably won the primary in '16 or '20. Let's get through today, and I am right beside you to push to the left!

[–] pjwestin 5 points 1 month ago

Well, I don't want to re-hash the rat-fucking the Dems gave Bernie in '16 and '20, but yeah, vote Harris on '24, for lack of literally any other viable alternative to facism. This year, I've voted for the Democratic ticket for the first time in over a decade (My state is incredibly blue, but I wanted to show solidarity with some swing state friends who were reluctant to vote for Harris).

[–] Snowclone 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If that's what they wanted they really should have been pointing out all the white women dying or going to prison in right wing states. White conservative women are 10x as racist as the men, you need to make it clear the gun is pointed at them if you want them to care at all.