Ask Lemmy

26643 readers

4336 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Rules: (interactive)

1) Be nice and; have fun

Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them

2) All posts must end with a '?'

This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?

3) No spam

Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.

4) NSFW is okay, within reason

Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].

5) This is not a support community.

It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.

Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Is capitalism the problem or is it neopotism (cronyism) invalidating the meritocracy? (self.asklemmy)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Clinicallydepressedpoochie to c/asklemmy

127 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] reddig33 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Deregulation is the problem.

allowing companies to merge until they become “too big to fail”
allowing companies to poison our environment and our bodies without fear of substantial repercussions
allowing companies to make false product claims without fear of substantial repercussions
allowing companies to lobby and contribute to political campaigns even though they can’t vote

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

I agree, but add the proviso that since under capitalism capital is power, those with the most capital will slowly find ways to use their capital to deregulate their income streams again.

Supporting friendly politicians, editorial control of the media, or even just the good old Starbucks/Wallmart practice of squashing independent competitors by leveraging economies of scale to outcompete on price - which at the end of the day, the poor customer has to pay attention to. These are all examples of how capital will find ways to get ahead.

Even if companies can't donate, the CEO or every member of the board still can.