544
Trump demanded 'special election' to reinstate him six months after leaving office: report
(www.rawstory.com)
this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
544 points (98.2% liked)
politics
19148 readers
3991 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Why would you think he will be?
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/08/28/key-things-to-know-about-us-election-polling-in-2024/
There's a lot to unpack in there but the following is the most concerning if you consider Kamalas current polling:
Even if the trend shown there was reversed Kamala is so damn close in current polls that any similar inaccuracy has her lose every swing state. I just don't see her winning, but I'm a seriously depressed pessimist so... Here's to hoping I'm wrong.
I just had to make a quick edit to laugh at the url that calls this a "short read" lol
You're getting downvotes because people disagree with you, but you posted a source and you explained yourself in good faith. That gets an upvote, imo.
That, or it’s tankies upset that you’re not pushing Stein as a spoiler candidate
Here's how Jeb can still win
Much appreciated!
I'm just a joe schmoe factory worker stressed out about it and trying to make sense of it all. I'm more than happy to have someone who understands it all better than this dumb factory schmuck tell me why I'm reading it wrong lol
Kamala has bad history. People may deceive themselves they don't care, but they still do, even those who eat with shit anybody criticizing her, just subconsciously. That subconscious influence on their behavior may affect those undecided around them. Trump is demented, but Kamala having the "lawful-neutral" flavor with some "lawful-evil" undertones makes the difference less notable for Republican voters. Some of the Democrat voters are less likely to go and vote due to having suppressed doubts.
It doesn't matter that "people against the establishment" is not the main theme of this election. It's still an unresolved question. That it's suppressed just shows the degree of media independence from political corporations (it not existing, that is). Trump is not "people" in this, but he manages to appear neutral between "people" and "the establishment", while Kamala doesn't, and her attempts are worse than lack thereof.
"We are going to throw you some bones and punish some corpos" is not a satisfactory position.
The cost of Trump winning for this world is too much, so I really hope he doesn't. But were that not so, one could say that worse is better, Trump winning would mean a political crisis and some reforms in the political system as its consequence, when they clean up the rubble.
There are a lot of reasons to think that it might go the other way this year. In 2016, we had a combination of overconfidence, lack of real enthusiasm, and a general sense of not giving a shit that allowed democrats, who outnumbered Trump supporters, to throw the election. In 2020, polling was completely fucked up by Covid. Democrats had higher margins in pre-election polling but less on Election Day mostly due to the fact that democrats were more cautious about the pandemic, and those who forgot to sign up for mail in voting decided to stay home for safety, and the on the ground get out the vote measures didn’t happen at all on the blue side. This year neither are true, and we saw in polls in 2022 underestimate democrats. Pollsters may have overcorrected for the quiet Trump voters while not accounting for the turnout caused by the scrapping of roe. If you want an example of over correction to account for republicans in polls, look at the 2022 Arizona gubernatorial election. I feel like polls are underestimating democrats this time around.
Don't be depressed. You're reading a statistical analysis of something that was already totally unreliable to begin with. The researchers could have conducted a better poll, that would fix the weak points that they perceive to exist in existing data, but they didn't. So now we have even more assumptions stacked on top of other assumptions, and it's really hard to think there's any kind of reliability to that data.
Polling errors are not predictable beforehand. If they were, we wouldn't have polling errors. In 2022 for instance there was polling error in favor of democrats not against (or at least too much emphasis on polls with errors in Republican favor).
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/31/us/politics/polling-election-2022-red-wave.html
We can't know the electorate beforehand, so poll weighting and deciding who is a likely voter is always going to involve some guesswork. So the opposite of what you say is true as well, if there is a small polling error that overstates Trump's support it would have Kamala sweeping every swing state.
But the polls show a close election, all we can do is do our best to do things that help her win. Like voting early to make sure our vote gets in no matter what, encouraging people we know to register and vote, volunteering, canvassing, donating, etc.
Polls are not so much a prediction of the future as they are a snapshot in time and indicative of a candidate's current momentum.
But you're right. It's deeply shocking that this race is even close. If the DNC ever tried to run a candidate as bad as Trump, I'd just stay fucking home or vote 3rd party as a throwaway vote. I hope some Republicans with any shred of dignity or a functioning moral compass do the same on election day. We need real patriots to come together across ideological gaps and reject fascism full stop.
Right, and that's why some of these Republicans coming out for Harris is considered good, but all some of us see is a rightward shift so now they want to stay home.
The non fascist side of Lemmy is so fractured and fickle that you can't talk to the dog owners without upsetting the cat owners, and by talking to either of those, the vegans are pissed.
And I don't know how to even approach fixing it for this election. RCV would help on the future though.
You’d better beIieve that if Republicans were a bastion of sanity and Democrats nominated someone batshit, that I’d vote Republican (or green, idk)
Watch this week's John Oliver (season 11, episode 26).
Because he Dems get complacent (Hillary 2016), the indies effectively sit it out until their entitlement gets fulfilled, and the magas are pretty much locked in for their orange fuhrer.
It is 8 years later and it still pisses me off with how badly they fucked up by coronating her as the nominee. Literally anyone else...