this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
58 points (96.8% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27627 readers
2418 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Not asking for tech support here, just wondering if in theory it would be possible to create a plug-in or even a complete browser that blocks ads in a way that's impossible to detect. One model that comes to mind is a quarantined / containerized non-blocking virtual browser which queries the web server directly, then the UX filters the content from that container and presents it to the user ad-free. As far as the web server can tell, the containerized browser is just vanilla Chromium.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yesman 5 points 4 months ago (3 children)

It doesn't matter how good your browser is when you can only access content through an app.

That's the way things are headed, I'm afraid. In a few years you won't be able to load Facebook, Youtube, Reddit, or Twitter(formally X) from a browser.

[–] Boozilla 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Bleak but probably true. Cabin in the woods with a good book is my future.

What do you mean all the woods are "gone"?

[–] JubilantJaguar 2 points 4 months ago

Paper books won't be available either. You'll be watching ads in your cabin where the woods used to be.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

They do still have to cater to desktop users, so I imagine accessible websites for those platforms will exist for many years to come.

[–] grue 5 points 4 months ago

This is also yet another reason why it's important to defend desktops in the face of people who think phones and tablets are "good enough."

[–] QuadratureSurfer 3 points 4 months ago

"Just download our app on the Microsoft Store/App Store!" /s

[–] AbouBenAdhem 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

An ad-blocking DNS server on your local network should work for apps too, right? (As long as the ads are hosted on known ad servers.)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Should, yes, but the page/site may have ways to detect if the ad loads or not and still trigger "adblock in use".

A DNS-based approach also won't work if the ads come from the same domain as the content.