this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
1415 points (97.7% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

25069 readers
4609 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tacosplease 53 points 5 days ago (6 children)

Please don't roast me here, but why is wanting to know what someone looks like without makeup such a bad thing? I've never even thought about it before, so please don't take this as advocating for it. It just doesn't immediately occur to me what the problem would be.

I get why it's gross to have an app to remove clothing, but makeup feels like a different category.

What about an app that changes or removes hair? Or one for sunglasses/jewelry?

Are they all gross in some way that I'm missing? Is it creepy to remove makeup from photos but not creepy to remove earrings?

[–] Meron35 37 points 5 days ago

On the surface it seems reasonable, but it tends to have misogynistic undertones, especially if said towards strangers.

It's like when the paparazzi publishes photos of celebrities with no makeup without their consent. If her makeup skills are good, she gets accused of "deceiving" people about her real age/looks. If her makeup skills are bad, she just gets called ugly.

[–] hydriplex 20 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

It's kind of creepy to do anything to a photo without consent. I'm a dude with plugs, and it'd be a little off-putting if a stranger I didn't know digitally removed my ear rings to see what I'd look like.

This is how I present myself. You can see me without ear rings or makeup when I want you too.

[–] Dozzi92 23 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Definitely thought you meant hair plugs at first, and that there was an app to give you male pattern baldness.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago (2 children)

You don't need an app for that, you just shake the board a little and the metal shavings fall to the bottom. You just have to use the little magnet stick to grow it back where you want!

[–] surewhynotlem 6 points 5 days ago

Oh Wooly Willy, you scamp!

[–] FlyingSquid 3 points 5 days ago

We saw a Wooly Willy in a store recently and my daughter got bored and walked away while I was explaining it to her.

These damn kids today with their tablets and their Nintendo Switches and their ADHD...

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I like that you asked. While I don't hold a strong opinion on it, I think you could argue that it is about consent.

I will argue more strongly than I feel because I think it helps to understand the point. (Assuming the person wearing makeup is a woman)

If you don't know the woman, why do you care if she wears makeup and how she looks without? It seems like there isn't a legitimate reason for it without it being a toxic reason, like "look! she isn't prettier than me!" Vibe. Which is toxic for both people. Now it was a man who made the app. Now there is the hating of women for wearing makeup reasons but let's ignore those. (Case: Unknown feelings of the woman)

If you know the woman and you don't know how she looks without makeup, then that is clearly a decision made by the woman. Why do you have the right to expose her in a way that she doesn't want to be. I mean some women don't care if you see their tummies and others would rather die. Should you have the right to expose a woman's tummy? (Case: Implied decision to not show herself like that)

If you know the woman and you want to argue that you have a justified interest in how she looks without makeup because she is a potential Partner (if she is a partner, you probably know already anyway). You could easily argue that you have the same legitimate reason to see her naked but obviously you wouldn't think that it is a legitimate reason.

In other words, you shouldn't care and it is kinda toxic to care; you don't have consent to see them like it otherwise you would; you have no right to know.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I've edited people's makeup and faces as part of the process of learning Photoshop, so I understand what you're saying. There are perfectly normal applications for this.

The issue is intent. A lot of men think that women are "lying" when they wear makeup. They think that the most valuable quality a woman can have is natural beauty, and treat makeup as trickery.

There's no shortage of men who think "You'd look better without makeup" is a compliment too.

An app like this would inevitably be used to help streamline the process of harassIng and negging women online.

There's also the matter that women can put great time and effort into their makeup, and having someone remove their hard work from an image and throw it back at them is quite insulting. A makeup artist is still an artist and they likely don't want their peers wielding tools designed specifically to nullify their work.

It shouldn't be illegal or anything. No law against being an asshole. But it isn't an app that will be used with good intent in most cases, and we should definitely pay attention because the "modify pictures of other people's faces and bodies" use case for AI appears to have the potential to do a great deal of harm.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

A makeup artist is still an artist

Bro I must have missed that section at the Louvre, can you suggest a few masterpieces for me to look up?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If inclusion in the Louvre is an obligatory status to be considered art, then makeup is absolutely art.

https://presse.louvre.fr/lancome-x-louvre-1063000212057/

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The brainrot is real. what do you think you proved linking to a press release about an ad campaign? where are the masterpieces of makeup? Zendaya and other zoomer influencers are unfortunately not art you tard

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Look, you're the one who set the Louvre as the standard for what is or isn't art. If you want to keep moving the goalpost, by all means, explain what you actually think makes something art.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago

You never reached the goalpost, I’m still waiting

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

bald

Snapchat’s offered that for years, though generally you get consent since you’ll point the selfie camera at yourself and a friend.

Hmm:

-> thinking about somebody naked

Widely accepted if you don’t talk about it

-> Photoshopping somebody naked

Widely despised (w/o consent). Maybe it’s too linked to the release at some point of the images. but I have a feeling even if no one ever posted that stuff, we would still feel icky about it.

Interesting, something is icky but I don’t know why

[–] RememberTheApollo_ 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I don’t know. I’ve seen a few examples of women who have radically changed their looks via skillful application of cosmetics.

I don’t know what to do with that. On one hand, society expects them to use available techniques to change their appearance to meet standards of beauty very few can ever accomplish. Otoh, it’s dishonest because irl they’re not who they seem to be, so an app that shows them without makeup might be useful. But the catch-22 is that the app may not be right, or that we judge too harshly based on an unattainable standard.

Man, Beauty is fucked up in the West. CGI, photoshop, photo manipulation have destroyed reality in favor of manipulating what desirability is.

[–] trxxruraxvr 20 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Man, Beauty is fucked up in the West.

Its no different in the East.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya 4 points 5 days ago

Let me tell you, Western women put make up much lighter than East Asian women.