this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
584 points (95.1% liked)

News

23404 readers
4709 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Duamerthrax 76 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Boomers have a much higher tolerance of SA and grooming. Look at how it's just accepted that Rock Stars could have underaged... pursuits.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 6 months ago (48 children)

I know this won't be popular, but it's for a few reasons:

  1. It wasn't and isn't illegal.
  2. Most people would look at her and see a hot woman and understand it.
  3. This whole puritanical BS that if you are over 18 and find someone under 18 attractive, that makes you a pedophile, is a modern a theme. Back then people were free to admit that they found young women attractive without being labelled by so many to have a mental disorder.

I speak strongly about this because I think we are doing great damage to mental health to repeatedly claim it's a mental disorder to have a completely normal and common biological attraction.

But don't get me wrong, I 100% support protecting minors from predators. I agree these laws should exist, I just wish people would stop pretending that there is something wrong with the attraction itself.

[–] Duamerthrax 24 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I don't really have an issue with a 16 year old dating an 18 year old. They're close enough that the age thing wouldn't be an issue, but 17 and 38 is a bit different.

I also don't really have an issue with adults being attracted to... people below the legal limit so long as they don't act on it. It's very difficult to have this discussion when most people can't grasp that desires don't always lead to actions and have problems separating fiction from reality. There are people with rape fetishes that find healthy, consensual ways to simulate the act, something that the mainstream can't really cope with.

But that's not really the discussion we're having. Jerry Seinfeld had a teenaged girlfriend when he was 38. Celebrities using their positions of power isn't acceptable.

[–] Maggoty 17 points 6 months ago

Romeo and Juliet laws show we absolutely have some tolerance for adults dating teenagers. And nobody I know is saying a 17 year old can't be sexually attractive. The problem is they essentially unarmed against the average 30 year old. And I'd much rather draw a line somewhere than the actual puritanical practice of marrying teenagers to a 40 year old man who happens to have the most money available.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] nomous 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Imagine responding to an actual thought out, reasoned argument with some braindead thought terminating snark. Saves the effort of trying to actually engage in conversation or uncomfortable thoughts I guess but that's about it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Still picking the bear. Your reply, and all the other salty misogynist replies are exactly why.

[–] nomous 0 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Ok, have fun I guess? Congratulations? Not sure what response you expect.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

To me, it's a distraction. I think it's legal in just about every state for someone to marry a child under the age of 15 with the approval of their parents.

[–] Duamerthrax 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It's not. Child marriage is illegal, even with parental consent, in 12 states. Proud Jersey boy here. If you don't live in a blue state that isn't one of the 12, start shaming your politicians.

[–] Gamoc 2 points 6 months ago

The issue seems to be that he was dating and fucking them.

load more comments (43 replies)
[–] frickineh 8 points 6 months ago

They really do. My own father married a 17 year old when he was 26 (years before he met my mom), and I spent a long time trying to justify it to myself with the fact that a lot of people did that kind of thing in the 70s. It wasn't until I was an adult that I was finally able to process my feelings about him as a human separate from my feelings about him as a father and just admit that was disgusting. He actually said her parents should've had him thrown in jail, but she was already a huge asshole (and still is) and they probably saw an opportunity to pawn her off on someone else. I'm not surprised she was a nightmare with everyone around her totally failing her, though.

[–] VaultBoyNewVegas 8 points 6 months ago

Yup. I can't listen to classic rock because it's near impossible to find a band or artist who wasn't fucking people under 16.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Hell, they wrote songs about it. "Jailbait" by Ted Nugent, "Seventeen" by Winger... I'm sure there are more.

[–] Madison420 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You mean the Ted Nugent that had a 13yr old girl living in his house while writing jailbait?

Bro he's a pedophile, pointing to a pedophile and going look there it's normal is fucking crazy.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I'm not saying it's normal. I'm saying it was normalized in the past, and thankfully that attitude is changing now and we can see how gross it always was.

Yes, Nugent is a fucking pedophile. He absolutely isn't alone in the world of rock in that, though.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Chuck Berry: hold my guitar.

Jerry Lee Lewis: hang onto this piano for me.

The list is as long as musicians are famous.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Aerosmith: gestures vaguely at discography