timewarp

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] timewarp 1 points 2 hours ago

Just FYI your theory on voter numbers is way off. Every election is unique. Some elections more people may vote or not. You can't compare voter numbers from just 2020 to determine how many more people are now Trump supporters or Democrat supporters.

[–] timewarp 1 points 2 hours ago

If I thought proud-Zionist Biden's terrible policy on Palestine was indefensible, which Kamala said she couldn't think of anything she'd do differently while pledging her unconditional support to Israel, on what planet do you think my position is in favor of Trump's policy? They are both indefensible and if you want to know which is worse, it very likely will end up being Trump, but it hasn't been realized thus far.

It is clear already, in your mind if someone dares criticize the almighty Democrats then they must support Trump, or be "an agent of the current administration."

I am curious though, how'd that so-called "useful opposition" that you surmounted work out for you in the last election?

[–] timewarp 1 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Not to the people that voted though. They thought Trump was the better candidate.

[–] timewarp 0 points 18 hours ago

Defamation laws are a civil matter. You have to sue someone & prove in court that you were defamed. There are also specific laws for public figures & case law for things said on Twitter/X. Furthermore, what is propaganda to you might be what some of them legitimately believe. You can't sue people for believing in a different ideology. For example, you can't sue someone for liking chocolate ice cream because you like vanilla, nor can you sue people because they believe that God doesn't exist. I'd love to see you take it to court though & send me the docker number once you do, so I can be amused.

[–] timewarp 1 points 19 hours ago

Ah I see, you're one of those people that thinks everyone who says something you don't agree with is a Russian. Have you talked to your psychiatrist about it? Generally a sign of schizophrenia.

[–] timewarp -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm raising awareness while you're attacking people opposed to genocide.

[–] timewarp 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There it is. The vengeful & death-wishing fascist cultist. Explains why you like fascist ideals like censorship.

[–] timewarp 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

I'm not saying their OS sucks. If it were not tied to their hardware, I'd prob use it too. But because they bundle them & upcharge their hardware a lot, it just isn't worth it IMO. I'd rather move towards an open-source OS or at least one not tied to hardware.

[–] timewarp -5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Trump got elected because of dumb pro-genocide corporate Democrats who decided they should send Mark Cuban out to tell everyone how much they love corporate interests & Dick Cheney.

 

Google Gemini seems to have been programmed to provide cookie cutter responses when asked questions about whether Trump tried to overturn the election.

When you point it out to Gemini, it says it isn't programmed to avoid any topics or viewpoints.

Even saying you'll accept a variety of sources & viewpoints on the topic to reach your own conclusion, results in it saying it can't answer.

When asking if it has been trained on research papers, case law, indexed news stories & even Wikipedia results, it says that it has.

37
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by timewarp to c/enoughmuskspam
 

Elon Musk was forced to admit that Grok sucks donkey balls today, of which he also has a penchant for the equestrian variety, like the time Musk offered a SpaceX flight attendant a horse that he had been inseminating believing he could create a Centaur.

He expressed to the world he sucks at creating companies, and is only capable of buying them. He made this statement when he said that even for close to 100 billion dollars wouldn't be enough for his team of incels to compete with ChatGPT-AI, led by sister-molester Sam Altman. Recently a Chinese company called DeepSeek was able to match ChatGPT for less than 10 million dollars, and without the need of a sister-molester.

4
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by timewarp to c/politicaldiscussion
 

Since “President” Musk isn’t even an elected government official and has a history of drug abuse, erratic behavior, narcissism, and child abuse… why won’t Democrats try to get one of the federal judges they appointed to issue an involuntary psych hold on him, like on a Friday evening… where they have him get drug tested & evaluated to see if he should be breaking into classified government systems, or if he’s been fueling up on ketamine again & snorting the addy’s or coke with his daddy role model.

Federal judges are lifetime appointments. The only people that can remove them are Congress & it requires impeachment with 2/3 just like the President. Essentially, if Democrats agree on this, there is no way the judge will get impeached as a result.

 

@gnukeith on X, a @Brave + $BAT Ambassador specifically chosen by Brave is now promoting far-right extremists on X.

Brave CEO, Brendan Eich, was previously ousted from his role as CEO of Mozilla, after it was found that he had donated to Prop 8, a campaign in California aimed at banning gay marriage. Despite Brendan Eich claiming at the time that he regrets his decision, he has since made multiple social media posts defending his anti-gay position.

At some point people must decide whether they wish to ditch the Fox, as Brave started advertising to users searching up Firefox on the Google Play Store, or if they want to ditch the anti-LGBTQ+ browser.

 
 

I received my ballot a week ago and I couldn't bring myself to fill it out yet. I'm scared of another Trump presidency if that is what happens, but I can't keep supporting Democrats that have become what they claim to hate. I know if I vote for her that I'm sending a message that they can keep using the same playbook to move closer to fascism and corporatocracy.

They use their influence & power to eliminate opposition, and their donor money to astroturf social media. They censor other voices online, and spread lies about other people (Jill Stein) without evidence. They gaslight and claim you're fascist for telling the truth and blame others for their mistakes. They'll use your money to pay for genocide while turning a blind eye to help themselves, but make a thousand excused why they can't help you.

They don't deserve to win. Trump will be bad and I'm scared about what will happen if he wins, but you and I are not to blame. All they had to do was be truthful, transparent, empathetic and genuine—but their lust for power got in the way.

146
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by timewarp to c/politics
 

This is an unpopular opinion, and I get why – people crave a scapegoat. CrowdStrike undeniably pushed a faulty update demanding a low-level fix (booting into recovery). However, this incident lays bare the fragility of corporate IT, particularly for companies entrusted with vast amounts of sensitive personal information.

Robust disaster recovery plans, including automated processes to remotely reboot and remediate thousands of machines, aren't revolutionary. They're basic hygiene, especially when considering the potential consequences of a breach. Yet, this incident highlights a systemic failure across many organizations. While CrowdStrike erred, the real culprit is a culture of shortcuts and misplaced priorities within corporate IT.

Too often, companies throw millions at vendor contracts, lured by flashy promises and neglecting the due diligence necessary to ensure those solutions truly fit their needs. This is exacerbated by a corporate culture where CEOs, vice presidents, and managers are often more easily swayed by vendor kickbacks, gifts, and lavish trips than by investing in innovative ideas with measurable outcomes.

This misguided approach not only results in bloated IT budgets but also leaves companies vulnerable to precisely the kind of disruptions caused by the CrowdStrike incident. When decision-makers prioritize personal gain over the long-term health and security of their IT infrastructure, it's ultimately the customers and their data that suffer.

 

About a month ago I got a notification that my subscription had been refunded and then another email that my account was terminated:

You are receiving this email because we have identified suspicious activity on your account. In order to protect our platform, we have refunded and canceled your subscription. You will no longer have access to ChatGPT Plus service.

This was after using the service for two months. I emailed and sent them a message almost immediately since I could prove my identity, but they haven't responded back in almost a month. Their customer support appears to be non-existent.

I keep wanting to sign back up, but I'm still pissed about it. I'm guessing it is because I used a virtual card when I signed up and they don't stay active for very long so I have to create a new one for each month of service. Usually I just get a failed payment notification and update my payment info with a new one which pulls from my bank account.

It sucks not being able to use the service though because it was so helpful at helping with programming tasks and Bard isn't nearly as good. Has anyone had any luck getting through to support?

view more: next ›