AdrianTheFrog

reference image if you have no idea what I'm talking about:

I know this is a minor nitpick, but it's something that annoys me.

I got this graphics card mostly because it was the best deal on Amazon at the time (gpu shortage), and I also thought it looked decent from the images they had. However, when I actually installed it, all I see is the relatively unattractive looking black metal backplate with some white text. The other side is always the side shown in the promotional images too - not a single one of the pictures in the Amazon listing even shows the side that you'll be seeing 99.9% of the time. Do they think everyone hangs their PCs above them from the ceiling, or has open-air testbenches? Why do they never even bother with the other side? I know they want the fans on the bottom so the cooling is better, but the air in front of the CPU shouldn't be that bad, a lot of cheaper GPUs don't need that much cooling, and a ton of people have watercooling now anyways so the CPU radiators just go on the sides.

my reasoning: the actual colors we can see -> the wavelengths that we can extrapolate to -> basically extrapolated wavelengths plus an 'unpure-ness' factor -> not even real wavelengths (ok well king blue and maybe lavender if I'm being generous could be)

{ "id": 7384484874, "name": "BeamNG logo", "description": "The logo of the game BeamNG.Drive, a softbody physics based realistic driving simulator.", "links": { "lemmy": [ "[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])" ], "website": [ "https://beamng.com/game/" ], "subreddit": [ "BeamNG" ] }, "path": { "0": [ [ 804, 294 ], [ 804, 294 ], [ 804, 292 ], [ 805, 291 ], [ 810, 289 ], [ 815, 289 ], [ 815, 291 ], [ 814, 293 ], [ 816, 295 ], [ 816, 298 ], [ 815, 299 ], [ 812, 299 ], [ 810, 297 ], [ 805, 297 ], [ 804, 295 ] ] }, "center": { "0": [ 810, 293 ] } }

Just 3% less votes than Jill Stein, and he dropped out 3 months ago

I've often seen this sort of thing in videos advertising GI in minecraft shaders, and tried it out in blender.

This is at JFK, does anyone know what they are used for? There wasn’t an obvious time when it was taking a picture.

Prompt: A cyberpunk scifi painting of a floating city in the air above the sea

It uses a new, fancier, 18GB text encoder (t5) to follow the prompt much more closely. It isn't perfect, but its much better than SDXL in my opinion. It does seem to be a bit worse at photorealistic subjects and has a tendency to create 1-pixel vertical lines.

Some other images:

impressionist, a woman sits in the middle of a crowded cyberpunk street, people bustling around, orange and blue glowing signs, warm atmosphere

a bright cinematic photo of a solarpunk city at midday, skyscrapers, steel, glass, vines and fields of vivid tropical plants

I get around 1 image every quarter of a second on my 3060. The quality isn't up to par with regular SDXL (not even close) but it follows prompts well and is extremely fast. Here are some of the best images in this batch:

Prompt: "impressionist oil painting, watercolor, a crying old southern man eats cheese at sunset in front of a futuristic dystopian cyberpunk city"

Material: 3D model: Original image: