this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2023
208 points (88.5% liked)

Political Memes

5622 readers
2306 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Turns out social democrats killing communist leaders (Spartacists), being lenient on fascists (Kapp Putsch) then using said fascists to kill communists (Freikorps and Ruhr uprisings) wasn't a great strategy either.

So across the board the whole "building and using fascism as a controllable tool" doesn't work out so well.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We're gonna get to see it again in the USA! Whee!

[–] Crashumbc 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] bigFab 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Do you have communists in USA? I thought the species was extinct in the states.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The United States has modern communists, they've read Gramsci and decided to join civil society and change it from the inside instead of overthrowing it in a violent revolution.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

They're just not as visible as they used to be. Unfortunately the primary species anymore is the invasive Marxismus Leninismus rather than the native Marxismus Orthodoxus, which was hunted to extinction in the 1920s.

[–] highenergyphysics 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s really interesting how people that spout this rhetoric universally just happen to agree with fascist ideologies, or use disingenuous both sides arguments that just happen to agree with right wing trite

[–] bigFab -1 points 1 year ago

I don't see the rhetoric here. It's just what happened and the cartoon fish are funny.

[–] bouh 7 points 1 year ago

So now is the time when history is rewritten so that fascists can have another try at world domination?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

"We can't work with those dumb-sucks from the iron front; they're too right-wing!"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Communists have a long track record of putting tyrants into power.

[–] Ensign_Crab 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As do moderates who are eager to appease tyrants.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The German social democrats, the moderate party during the Weimar Republic, were the only party to vote against the enabling act (nazi takeover)

[–] TempermentalAnomaly 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The KPD was banned from voting on the Enabling Act. If they hadn't been, its hard to imagine they would have voted for it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I don’t doubt that, the KDP would definitely vote against it, but my point is the “social democrats and moderates love appeasing fascists” is not true

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The social democrats were the left-wing, Zentrum would have been the moderate party, and Zentrum voted for the Enabling Act.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

That’s true, but in terms of Weimar politics, the social democrats were pretty moderate compared to the… other political forces

[–] Ensign_Crab 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Neville Chamberlain thought he could appease nazis. Stepped off that plane waving the worthless agreement he thought he had with Hitler. Thought he could go through proper channels and meet nazis in the middle. The whole world saw how that worked out, and what irredeemable foolishness it is to try to appease fascists.

Those who appease nazis today do so with the clarity of hindsight, and know that appeasement and collaboration are one in the same. So long as Chamberlain's folly is remembered, there will never be another Neville Chamberlain. But there can be other Vidkun Quislings.

[–] yesman -1 points 1 year ago

This whole "Chamberlain appeased Hitler" meme might be trivially true. But it's also banal, obtuse, and a confession that one has never read a history that didn't have to be turned back in at the end of the year.

I've seen prominent politicians and public intellectuals shitpost the Chamberlain meme every time they've wanted to justify aggression or discredit diplomacy. Not to mention that Chamberlain was doing exactly what the vast majority of British citizens demanded of him. Scared as they all were after the Great War. Or the little detail that British Intelligence had produced a report saying that preventing Germany from taking Czechoslovakia militarily was "impossible".

The whole premise is fucked. GB was in no position to dictate anything to Hitler. Would history look more kindly on impotent sabre rattling? Would Hitler have been cowed?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Revolutions hurt poor and working class people more than they hurt those in power. Violent revolutions are not something that should ever be worshipped or deliberately sought.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It took a while, but they did get half of Germany (sort of)

[–] Aux 1 points 1 year ago

I mean they got GDR in the end, so... Success!