They've actually found that trans individuals have brain structures that match their identity rather than their sex at birth.
So while the way genders are supposed to act is a social construct, gender is very much biological as well.
The truth is at this stage we don't fully understand it.
I'd love to learn more about that, do you have a source I can go to read more?
Thank you, that's some great reading. Very... dense haha I'm far from a biologist or scientist of any kind so I'm doing quite a bit of googling but some great info in there
That doesn't back up your claim at all, the evidence is still incredibly weak and the sample sizes are all very small
Sample sizes can only get so big when studying less than a percentage of the population
It does back up my claim we've found evidence of it in trans people. I also explicitly said we don't understand it yet.
Considering the only evidence the other camp has is "the Bible" and "their feels," Ima take it. 🤷
I know this is a joke, but these kinds of topics are showing up in children's media these days. Which i think is great. Simple representation matters.
I'm not lgbt but when you witness first hand what people talk about when they say transgender you undertand everything.
My cousing was born in 1990, nobody talked about it and being gay was stil a big no no, specially being the son of one of 5 brothers. I have 18 cousings and only me and 1 other are women, the rest are all men. All of us were raised together in the same way, so much so that I'm very much not girly and only tried makeup for the first time at 18.
All that to say that my cousing was NOT influenciate in any way but he was born pretty much a girl, a LOT more girly than me. He woud sing all the little mairmaids songs, dance like he was Belle, LOVED dolls and being "mommy" etc. Mind you he was 2, 3, 5 yo. His parents put him in 10 different psychiatrists. Nothing worked (obviously). he tried hiding or even toning down but there was no way, the boy was born a princess.
Every time I hear about gender x bio sex I remeber him He never had a "choice", that's what he was born as.
I wish he had had the chance to be himself when he was young (he never changed his gender but he finally "came out" to his dad about 5 years ago)
This was very much my experience with the trans girl I grew up with 35 years ago. From the instant she was able to express preferences (I'm talking like age 18 months to 2 years), it was all princesses and dolls and makeup and trying on mom's high heels. We all just assumed she was a gay boy because we had never heard of a transgender person before.
We encouraged her to just keep that behavior at home because she was bullied mercilessly for appearing to be an effeminate boy. But nothing would stop her; she was completely irrepressible.
When in high school, she told us she was really a girl, it was like the most face-palmingly obvious thing. Of COURSE that's what we'd been seeing her entire life. It just made sense. That's just who she is.
I don't think witnessing it is really enough to understand it for everyone.
For example, I don't fit in with traditional gender norms. Yet at the same time I don't feel like I was born into the wrong sex/gender. And if I was born as the opposite sex, I think I'd be pretty indifferent about it. I don't really care either way for myself, personally.
I have both transgender and nonbinary friends and I simply don't relate to their struggles. While I don't feel like I fit in, I don't feel like I'm the "wrong" gender/sex either.
I respect transgender and nonbinary individuals. And I think they absolutely deserve to live their life the way that makes them the most comfortable being themselves. But unfortunately, even witnessing this stuff fist hand doesn't mean I'll ever personally be able to understand gender dysphoria.
I'm supportive, but I'll never truly understand. But I don't think you have to fully be able to understand to be an ally.
Same
Me neither. Apparently, some schools teach this, but most only learn this in college.
Which is why the culture war so often involves College educated van non-College educated.
I'm on the College side of the culture war, but we must kind of acknowledge the truth that we had extra education that the other side did not.
Some of them might resent us for it, some of us might be snobby about it.
But at root, that's where the culture disparity stems from.
You're being too kind. Many of them are anti-education. That's why they're spending huge amount of time burning books about gay people and banning abortion, and far less time trying to reduce school shootings or paedophilia in mainstream churches.
To paraphrase the old adage: you can't educate someone out of a position that they didn't educate themselves into.
The number of times people that have denied the literal dictionary definition of gender when I place it in front of them... with linked sources... from multiple dictionaries... often ones those people chose themselves...
Education about the definition of these words is important, but it does nothing to combat the mainstream conservative position that "the dictionary is wrong and woke because... idk - the Jews want them transes to rape babies or something." The only way to combat that entrenched, willful ignorance is with a big rock.
You're being too kind.
While I know where you're coming from, there's no path to ever making things better without kindness, empathy, and an open mind. Yes, their actions are draconian and misguided, steeped in superstition and myth, but if we simply give up entirely, we don't have any hope of making the progress that we all seem to agree needs to be made.
I don't have a silver bullet to solve the problem, I'm simply suggesting that those among us who are truly progressive should steadfastly seek to enroll others in our cause, rather than simply writing them off as a lost cause. Some people certainly are, others simply haven't had issues explained to them in a way that fits into their world view. Good luck to us all on the path that lay ahead.
It's only repeated in just about every corner of the Internet and popular culture!
Good, mfers need to learn
But it goes as far as the brain can understand it. For bigot brains, it just slides off
Fraa Jad was wrong; topology is not always destiny.
Both?
Biological sex is also a spectrum
Please can you explain this in genetic terms?
As I understood it, sex is determined by the presence, or absence, of a Y chromosome, at the 23rd pair.
While exceptions exist, they're incredibly rare genetic observations and I have never heard or read it referred to as a "spectrum".
Yeah it's the first time I've heard of it referred to as a spectrum. Although the term is insensitive it's more like two sides with a few outliers.
You have your XX females and your XY males making up 99.9% of the population and then some individuals who are XXY, XYY, or XXX. You can even have some who are XXXY, XXYY, or XXXX.
In terms of how that affects biological sexual development and associated gender identity i can't say offhand and it would likely be a rabbit hole that one can spend hours looking into.
https://youtu.be/kT0HJkr1jj4?si=_gOsunaQoUZ0bg0W
TL;DW: your understanding is a simplification. It an assumption that allows educators to move past complex nuances when teaching about broader topics as part of a general education. Chromosomes and gene expression are a chaotic mess in reality.
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://piped.video/kT0HJkr1jj4?si=_gOsunaQoUZ0bg0W
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.
It's not really about the genotype. Every context that uses sex to divide people into groups has its own definition of sex. Sometimes with a spectrum sometimes not.
Example car crash testing: When testing safety features of cars, you're not gonna care about whether the person has a vagina or not, but features like height, neck strength and other stuff will matter.
Since women are on average smaller and less muscular than men, small people with weak necks will be categorized as female. Tall people with strong necks will be categorized as male.
Example Condoms:
Two categories: has penis (male, can use) and has no penis (not male, cannot use [for inteded purpose]). So if you are XY genotype, but without a penis (idk cut off?), you're not a male in that context.
As you see both examples correlate with the gonosomes, but are not defined by it.
I'm at the "'not getting any" end of the spectrum