this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
152 points (91.8% liked)

Canada

7241 readers
399 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is this not a fairly cut and dry discriminatory firing case?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

And when/where/to who.

Edit: it states in the article what she said, which is that Israel should not exist.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It also says when (while she was not at work).

My opinion is that really shouldn't matter what you've done, if you weren't on the clock, your employer has nothing to say about it.

I can see exceptions when you are misrepresenting yourself as acting in an official capacity or if you are clearly "the public face" of the company (like an on-air personality or public spokesperson). On the face of it, none of that applies here.

[–] sailingbythelee 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Most professionals are expected to uphold the standards of their profession, whether on the clock or not, and that typically includes not bringing the profession into disrepute. That is why doctors, nurses, etc., who spread misinformation about COVID-19 vaccination were disciplined.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Fair enough. As I said, I can see room for exceptions, but the more control your employer has over your free time, the less free that time is. I'm not interested in going back to the days when a person could be fired for driving the wrong make of car.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Imagine someone spends their weekends harassing gay people then during the week they work at a gay bar

Do you think the clientele would want to be served by them?

Who you are outside of work directly impacts the business

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I think it's quite clear that, in that case, the server is the face of that business. What happens if instead, the person is working in the back room keeping the books?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So if I run around shouting slurs in my own time, should I be doxxed and reported to my employer?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Absolutely not. What business is it of mine who you work for?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Fair enough.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Anyone else getting that whole "wmd's in iraq" vibe again?

[–] GutsBerserk 1 points 1 year ago

This one is worse. Back then, one can argue, it was innocent times. Right now people have more access to information.

[–] GutsBerserk 0 points 1 year ago

So much for "freedom of speech"! Bigots.