this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
272 points (96.3% liked)

Technology

55702 readers
4365 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 138 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (6 children)

Firefox is calling all of you.

We just added a “copy link without trackers” context menu option too ;)

[–] [email protected] 38 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Big cocks at Firefox doing the lord's work once again

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

So that's what people mean when they say Firefox works with BSD

[–] RGB3x3 5 points 7 months ago

Big Sexy Dicks, yes.

[–] nutsack 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

BILLY MAZE HERE WITH A HOT NEW BROWSER PRODUCT

[–] OneOrTheOtherDontAskMe 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

CALL NOW AND YOU CAN GET AN OFFER TO RECEIVE A SECOND NEW BROWSER, FOR ONLY 12.99!

"12.99?"

THAT'S RIGHT, 12.99. BE ONE OF THE FIRST 200 CUSTOMERS TO CALL AND WE'LL THROW IN A WEEK'S WORTH OF BROWSING CACHE FOR FREE!!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

Well at this period of time one of the interns will have removed Firefox's user agent from the whitelist most Google services by mistake again.

If so, I just hope antitrust lawsuits will be fast enough so that it doesn't build up a bad reputation for Firefox ...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 116 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ad Blockers will limit Chrome usage starting June 2024.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The long awaited Firefox domination of the market !

[–] [email protected] 26 points 7 months ago

Right in time for the year of Linux on the desktop!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Users will limit Google Chrome starting June 2024.

[–] kokesh 6 points 7 months ago

I already did.

[–] RickRussell_CA 31 points 7 months ago

I've been limiting Google Chrome for about 5 years now.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I’d be very curious how they are going to try and fuck over Firefox, or similar browsers.

It’s not “just business “, it’s personal. It’s all personal, Mike. You know who I learned that from? Your Father, the Godfather.

[–] PurpleTentacle 13 points 7 months ago

Google's proposed "Web Integrity API" browser-DRM was probably the biggest attack on the open web since its conception. I don't think they have fully given up on that idea and they'll likely sneak it in more gradually and slowly. Manifest v3 is just a small baby step in this direction of taking away user control.

[–] Dicska 9 points 7 months ago (3 children)

The various websites will just say Firefox is "not supported". I just wrote this in another comment, but Twitch doesn't let you log in on FF because it has some kind of advanced tracking protection. I guess YouTube and the rest will just join the fuckery and block you from using their content if you're on FF. I mean, I really hope they won't do that, but knowing what degree of assholery these companies can pull off, I think it's the next step.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Presumably the FTC will have something to say about blatant anticompetitive actions such at these. Then again, that's why corporations buy themselves representatives, senators and judges.

Edit: such not suck

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

This is news to me. I log into twitch on FF all the time.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Same no problems here and I have those strict features enabled.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

I used to have that issue with Twitch and FF, the fix was to create a new Firefox profile :)

[–] rustyfish 28 points 7 months ago

Oh ffs. FINE! I will switch away from Chrome!

[–] DeskP1loti 27 points 7 months ago

what a bunch of cunts

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago

Congratulations, you are being tailored a "personal experience"! Please do not resist.

[–] agent_flounder 13 points 7 months ago

Not surprising since Google is an ad company. I

Meanwhile I have been using Firefox on my various computers for a few years now.

[–] HowManyNimons 12 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Oh no! There are literally zero other options but to use Chrome!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I know you are being sarcastic, but it's not sarcasm at all, and therefore no laughing matter, when more and more websites drop support for none-chromium browsers, or actively block them. Netizens tend to have some missguided belief that every problem can be solved with software alone. This is a trap.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What about Brave their whole sales pitch is ad blocking?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

This impacts all Chromium based browsers. Unless support is maintained separately by browser vendor, only other option is Firefox or any of its forks.

This is kind of a time for Mozilla to shine, but I worry they will mess up and maybe even follow later.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

I limited google chrome a long time ago when i switched back to firefox for good

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

I wonder if there ever will be a point where the mayor populous actually goes "screw this" and starts finding out how to change their browser via "how to change internet" or "how to change google"

will there ever be a point where this even happens i wonder, like at all

[–] FishFace 6 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Firefox's decision to move to WebExtensions is starting to look even more questionable, IMO.

[–] TangledHyphae 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] FishFace 3 points 7 months ago

It was originally questionable because it completely hobbled extensions, and now Chrome is seeking to hobble the standard even more

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

Yeah, perhaps not their greatest move ever. I miss how customizable Firefox used to be. For a long time I used Waterfox Classic to postpone the switch, but it got harder and harder. Now you have to use stuff like paxmod to get back some of the old features.

I don't know the internal technical issues too well, though, and they have made a lot of headway in the speed department since switching. I do recall discussion around when they dropped them about being held back by the addon architecture.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

On mobile I'm using DDG as primary browser. Firefox as secondary.

On my personal machine it's Firefox and Chromium.

For my job I use Thorium as main (switched coming from Brave), Chrome, Firefox and Edge.

Could do without Chrome any day.

[–] PurpleTentacle 6 points 7 months ago

On mobile I'm using DDG as primary browser.

Don't get me wrong, DDG's app is a massive step up in privacy, but it's hardly a browser, it's simply a WebView frontend. You're pretty much still using Chrome.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I'm only using Chrome for work because the profile switching & syncing is so much smoother and our company is split into two primary brands - my brain handles it better with an individual browser profile for each.

We're consolidating everything into one next year, meaning I can ditch the second browser!

I've tried setting up a second profile but it was just too much effort to get it working and bring everything across from both, then do the same on my laptop for travel, so I'll just wait for now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

I really don't understand why Mozilla doesn't add a profile switch icon in Firefox.

Most people probably have no idea that Firefox can do profiles or some of the stuff it can do with them (sync online, send tabs between devices etc.)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Multi account containers. Check it out.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


A year later, Google is restarting the phase-out schedule, and while it has changed some things, Chrome will eventually be home to inferior filtering extensions.

Google's blog post says the plan to kill Manifest V2, the current format for Chrome extensions, is back on starting June 2024.

The company says: "We expect it will take at least a month to observe and stabilize the changes in pre-stable before expanding the rollout to stable channel Chrome, where it will also gradually roll out over time.

On the high end now for me, Slack is drinking 500MB, while a single Google Chat tab, created by this company that is so concerned about performance, is at 1.5GB of memory usage.

Google is adding a completely arbitrary limit on how many "rules" content filtering add-ons can include, which are needed to keep up with the nearly infinite ad-serving sites that are out there (by the way, Ars Technica subscriptions give you an ad-free reading experience and make a great holiday gift!).

Mozilla's blog post on the subject promises "Firefox’s implementation of Manifest V3 ensures users can access the most effective privacy tools available like uBlock Origin and other content-blocking and privacy-preserving extensions."


The original article contains 714 words, the summary contains 197 words. Saved 72%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I know Firefox is the popular option here, but do we have any serious non-google managed Chromium based browser options out there that don't have some weird gimmick?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

+1 for Vivaldi. If you remember old, Presto-era Opera you'll feel right at home with it. I know there are some people who moved from Firefox to it, too.

Only thing is, their integrated adblocker doesn't support cosmetic filtering right now, but it's in the works.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Brave leads chrome-based browsers in terms of privacy and security, as long as you don't mind its endless controversies.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

of seeings patturn

load more comments
view more: next ›