this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
143 points (87.8% liked)

Technology

59578 readers
5141 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NOT_RICK 62 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Another iteration and another test launch, duh

[–] kokesh 59 points 1 year ago (3 children)

As much as I really really hate that asshole, this was a success. The hot staging technically worked and the Starship got to space. Iterate on the booster top heat management and fix whatever went wrong with Starship and it will be fine.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dhork 52 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We put Elon on the next one

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oh, I know this one! The third explosion, right?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Comedy comes in threes. They’re practically obligated to explode the last one.

[–] Mr_Blott 2 points 1 year ago

Shortly thereafter, MuskBoy blaming it on a particular religious sect

[–] NeoNachtwaechter 17 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I guess it's the good old 'fail fast' strategy.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

It actually is, and it worked pretty well in this case. The first launch was pretty pre mature, they could have gotten more data out of if they had taken a little more time. But this one was pretty much the sweet spot of getting into the interesting parts of fight, but not waiting for diminishing returns.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes. Like, they literally corrected everything that went wrong in the first test. And it only took 7 months.

  • launch pad blown to shreds -> fully intact water suppression system

  • Engines exploding on takeoff -> all engines on both the booster and ship operational on first ignition

  • stage separation failed -> HOT staging successful

  • Self-destruct system didn't destruct fast enough -> self destruct happened immediately

The next launch will probably focus on the fail points of this launch. That is, re-lighting the engines on the booster after turnaround. And whatever caused the starship to go off course (?) and activate the self-destruct.

meanwhile Boeing discovers some valves were stuck, takes half a year to fix it only to discover they're still stuck, gonna need another half a year... oh wait, we took too long trying to fix it, we gotta completely replace them, that'll be another year...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They should optimize for neat explosions.

  • Not Michael Bay (I swear)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Kinda what rockets do

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

I would say the rocket is ready for billionaires who want to beta test it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fuck Musk, first and foremost, but this flight has been a success, they have successfully separated the booster which was very cool to see.

[–] SpaceNoodle 3 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›