CEOs? Ruin their career? By what, jumping ship and taking a $100M bonus?
Lol, like the previous Boeing CEO. Kill a few hundred people, planes or plane components falling out of the sky, absolutely tank all manufacturing quality control, fail a NASA contract and strand a few astronauts...
Peace out and take a $62M bonus.
I wish I could get paid that much for failure or "accepting responsibility" lol
You throwing a communist party?
Would the army even exist if it weren't for young, naive, and/or desperate folk?
It also reuses old 2G/3G bands to allow much much higher throughput and therefore more customers per band
Sounds like you just need to play an RTS game.
food deemed too sad even for No Frills
Lol
Yeah, it pumps GDP numbers up. By having more people to do work.
Not by increasing GDP per capita.
It can suppress wages.
Immigrants often are expected to work for less money. After all, they usually immigrate from an economically worse country, so they don't expect to land top tier wages.
You keep filling in minimum wage jobs with an endless supply of immigrants, then there is never a worker shortage and never any incentive to raise the bar. No company needs to compete with higher wages to attract talent. In fact, it can make things worse and cause a race to the bottom... Reducing wages on existing positions until workers quit and just filling it with less skilled workers.
Oh, 75% electric now?
I just remember when they were first announced and basically none of them were electric, despite most postal routes being low speed, short distance, and frequent stops. Sounded absolutely stupid and reeked of industry kickbacks and bullshit.
Yeah, geekbench has long been known to favor iPhones. Even compared to other mobile SoCs like Qualcomm or MediaTek, it's... uh... "optimized" for what Apple chips are designed around.
Using it on a desktop for benchmarking is... Even more useless.
On top of that:
The single core number obviously only uses one big core, of which Apple's chip only has 2.
The score only reflects the maximum burst speed (it's not expected to sustain that kind of performance for more than 10 seconds. Even using both big cores simultaneously would cut that score short due to overheating.
Desktop cpu has 16 cores that are all identical, and is expected to sustain those workloads indefinitely. Servers and supercomputers run these things 24/7.
The desktop cpu is on an older node as well, inherently less power efficient.
It's a bit like saying, "for 10 seconds, I can run as fast as the world's fastest marathon ~~runner~~ TEAM!". Neat factoid but still incomparable.
They already stuck a screen on the back
If you commute that much you're living in a box either way