this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
149 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

59712 readers
5873 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Google will begin deleting millions of inactive Gmail and Drive accounts in December::undefined

all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

Fortunately, they at least aren't deleting accounts with YouTube videos "at this time"

I still backed up the videos from a deceased friend's channel just in case- but I'm glad his content will still be there.

[–] GrapesOfAss 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What happens if someone is in prison for a few years and can't access their email?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

This is a good reminder to designate someone access to your accounts if you don't log in after a set amount of time (and now less than 2 years). If you die and someone is relying on you to pay the bills or whatnot, they will need access to that information.

You can also have it set up so that all your data is wiped.

[–] coffeebiscuit 1 points 1 year ago

If that’s the case. They probably wouldn’t know this. And if they eventually do?… they probably forgot their passwords.

[–] sronweb 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I see it's normal for me. If an account is inactive, the user perhaps has created another account or not using Google services anymore its money saving if we consider all personal data, ie 15 Gb per user, which are stored and maintained without reason.

[–] pete_the_cat 8 points 1 year ago

Yeah, people went ape shit when they deleted YouTube accounts that weren't active for years. If you don't use something and aren't paying for it, what right do you have to be like "keep this around, even though I'm not using it and it costs you money"?

[–] ozymandias117 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The downside is that Google won’t let you keep them active without jumping through hoops

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Jumping through hoops?

Merely being logged in while using any of their websites or services any time in the last 3 years is enough to be considered an active account.

Watching a single youtube video or doing 1 Google search or reading a news article or accessing one of those precious files you have saved on their cloud server while logged in once every 3 years is hardly "jumping through hoops".

[–] ozymandias117 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It won’t allow you to log back in without adding a phone number, even though it had been used during those three years

They’re just trying to get rid of anonymous accounts

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So what's the point of such anonymous account? Waiting for 10 more years till policy is changed by some reason or you finally figure out a way how to get a number that's not tied to your name?

I am surprised they did not have such periodical purges in the past.

[–] ozymandias117 4 points 1 year ago

I mean, yes?

Making it harder for the average person to keep their identity separate from their Google account is the point…

They hadn’t done this in the past because they weren’t big enough to keep people on their service while degrading the service

[–] pete_the_cat 3 points 1 year ago

I have a Google Voice number that I set up years ago and never used. They sent me an email saying "you haven't used this in a while, send one text or make one phone call to keep the number active".

[–] rob299 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The good news, as others said is that Google claims that Youtube channels wont be affected, however I aasume that over time they'l go that rought as more people start to stream in 8k or beyond. At some point they are going to have to delete older content as hosting it all isn't cheap. As big they are Google can only go so far for preservation when they keep boosting streaming video quality options.

[–] kadu 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah, newer content is significantly more costly than older content, specially as Google can simply decide to show ads regardless.

Old YouTube content is what? 480p? 720p at most? They have already re-encoded their entire video library, it's super efficient. The real storage hogs are the modern 4K, 8K, HDR, 60 FPS video files.

[–] rob299 0 points 1 year ago

the point is.. are they going to rid of old content from an erra that less people remenber or current content that increasingly more people are likely to watch willingly to get ad revenue.

in order to save on costs they are wanting to rid of older content ultamately one year of videos on Youtube can easily save gbs of storage and costs, right now they are starting with gmail but at some point I predict they'l adopt it to Youtube.

[–] cabron_offsets 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] pete_the_cat 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah "fuck these guys for trying to save money by cleaning up stuff that hasn't been used in years!"/s

They're just doing what any other company would do.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Data harvested. Time to move on.