this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
600 points (99.0% liked)

politics

18801 readers
3996 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

On a sticky Texas morning, Kimberly Mata-Rubio is lacing up her running shoes ahead of two races she is running in Uvalde in tribute to her daughter Lexi, who was killed in the 2022 Robb Elementary School shooting.

First up is a charity run honoring Lexi’s life. Then it’s back to a tougher contest: Campaigning to become mayor of Uvalde, a town still divided after one of America’s deadliest mass shootings and a botched police response that is still under investigation.

“One thing I hear with all of my children, and it echoes my own belief, is that right now Lexi’s legacy is our priority and we just want to honor her with action,” Mata-Rubio said.

all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 98 points 10 months ago

Reminder that the Uvalde police wanted this covered up so badly they threatened a local mother with violation of her probation if she continued to speak out about it.

https://www.newsweek.com/uvalde-mom-who-saved-kids-school-shooting-says-police-threatened-her-1712842

[–] [email protected] 60 points 10 months ago (2 children)

NRA: Look at her, politicizing her daughter’s death!

[–] Viking_Hippie 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

To quote Skunk Anansie: yes it's fucking political, everything's political!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

also: it's small town texas; i wonder if she actually expects to achieve anything.

[–] Viking_Hippie 9 points 10 months ago

She might win. Absurd life-altering tragedies have a way of changing the perspectives and opinions of the people they affect.

[–] Son_of_dad 52 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Uvalde overwhelmingly re-elected the same politicians, judges and sheriffs that led to the shooting and lack of response. Uvalde also voted strongly for Abbott.

That's when my last shred of sympathy for that community evaporated. If they don't care about their own children being killed, why should I? Clearly they want this to continue happening.

[–] drislands 25 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Consider that sometimes there are more voters who are unaffected by the people and policies they vote for, than voters who are affected.

I imagine in the case of Uvalde, there are more grumpy senior citizens who don't give a shit about the lives of children than there are parents of school age children -- or at least more voters in the former category than the latter.

Don't forget that voter suppression exists, too. Just because the same shit heels got voted back in doesn't mean that the people who were most hurt didn't try to do something about it. Don't give up your sympathy because of what it looks like to you at a distance.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

i've learned first hand that not even the liberals in austin give a rats ass about voter suppression in texas; so she must be doing this for herself because she's not going to have an impact in uvalde and much less for the rest of the state.

[–] ZombieTheZombieCat 6 points 10 months ago

Well if it happened in Austin then it must apply to everyone and everywhere else. Makes perfect sense.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Bullshit. It pisses off the liberals and moderates. Some may have given up and are convinced they can't do anything to change it, but no one likes it.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

How does any of that change what they said?

[–] drislands 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

In case you're legitimately asking:

OP is saying that "they" don't care that "their" kids are being killed. This reads as OP saying the parents of the murdered children don't care about their own murdered children. OP says that because the same bad politicians from before the shooting were voted back into office, this means the parents don't care. OP therefore says they won't bother caring either.

I'm saying the bad politicians may not have been voted back in by the parents of the murdered children, and instead have been voted back in by callous people who don't care about other peoples murdered children. This would mean OP's assertion that the parents don't care is wrong, and their decision to not care about murdered children is wrong.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants 2 points 9 months ago

And that was in reply to:

Uvalde overwhelmingly re-elected the same politicians, judges and sheriffs that led to the shooting and lack of response. Uvalde also voted strongly for Abbott.

That’s when my last shred of sympathy for that community evaporated. If they don’t care about their own children being killed, why should I? Clearly they want this to continue happening.

A comment directed at the community as a whole.

So even if what you say is true, it simply reinforced OP's point that the community is fucking garbage, as the fact there would even be a majority of evil people to override the will of the parents makes the town undeserving of sympathy.

[–] ZombieTheZombieCat -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If they don't care about their own children being killed, why should I?

Wow, you sound like such a wonderful person. Jesus fucking christ.

[–] Son_of_dad 4 points 10 months ago

I didn't kill their kids, I didn't stand around refusing to help, and I didn't re-elect cowards who let kids die... Uvalde did though. So as bad and callous as my opinion sounds, it's not as bad as what they did to themselves

[–] [email protected] 45 points 10 months ago (1 children)

She would have my vote, wouldn't even need to think twice about it.

Hope she wins.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The issue is whether she has Uvalde's vote. They reelected abbot in a landslide even after all of the death and incompetence.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

No doubt, I don't understand Texas politics. I consider what shithouse fucked up stuff lead to the Alamo and how dearly they hold onto it's legacy... I think it's all I probably need to know.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Why didn't her daughter go to school with a gun to stop the bad guy with?

[–] CosmicCleric 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think you forgot the "/s".

[–] bitwaba 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Nah, looks like a pretty serious statement to me.

[–] CosmicCleric 2 points 10 months ago

My comment was meant as a comedic reply, and not as a actual correction. But thanks for replying.

[–] RGB3x3 9 points 10 months ago

God I hate this headline trend of "she/he did this, now she's/he's doing this" as a stupid clickbait title.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Then it’s back to a tougher contest: Campaigning to become mayor of Uvalde, a town still divided after one of America’s deadliest mass shootings and a botched police response that is still under investigation.

For Mata-Rubio, who would become Uvalde’s first female mayor, part of the challenge in her campaign is convincing the small town of 15,000 people to choose a new direction.

Months later, the Texas Legislature brushed off calls by Mata-Rubio and other Uvalde parents to raise the minimum purchase age for some firearms — which, they say, could have prevented the tragic shooting.

The shooting upended her previous life as a soft-spoken reporter at the Uvalde Leader-News who was content with small-town living alongside her six children and husband, a local sheriff’s deputy.

“Her candidacy may have a little bit more movement because she knows the people in that town and she understands the hurt that this event caused,” said Brandon Rottinghaus, a political science professor at the University of Houston.

“I am never stopping as her mom, as an advocate, but as running for mayor my main focus is bringing the community back together because we cannot move forward, we cannot see progress until we are on the same page,” Mata-Rubio said.


The original article contains 999 words, the summary contains 206 words. Saved 79%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!