this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
324 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

58100 readers
3435 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Meta has 30 days to stop using the name

all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ghostalmedia 180 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Same name, same industry - digital messaging.

If Meta didn’t have a massive amount of money and lawyers, this would be a VERY easy case to win.

Meta decided they wanted the name, tried to buy it, and then opted to knowingly rip it out of a smaller company’s hands. What a bunch of assholes.

[–] Fredselfish 60 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Why was he hell bent on using the name Threads. Every time I hear it makes me think of the Dragon Riders or Pern. Not messaging app. Fuck Meta hope the real Threads company wins.

[–] glimse 45 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I agree with the last sentence but Threads seems like a completely appropriate name for the service. Online conversations have been called threads for decades

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

social media platform called posts when

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Right but it could've had a nonsense name, like Troods.

[–] glimse 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

....Troods would have been enough for me to try it out so fair point

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana 3 points 10 months ago

I'd fucking love Troods.

[–] Aqarius 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That just makes it too generic to trademark then. Imagine an automaker called "Cars".

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Or a social media platform called "X."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

The name just reminds me of the film. So I just assume that like the film the site is nightmare fuel and avoid it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago

"Drummer, beat, and piper, blow,
Harper, strike, and soldier, go.
Free the flame and sear the grasses
Till the dawning Red Star passes."

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

It makes me think of the apocalyptic nuclear war drama. Quite appropriate.

[–] DontTreadOnBigfoot 4 points 10 months ago

A dragon must fly when there are Threads in the sky.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

To be fair, apps like that do tend to encourage people to isolate themselves at home, rather than going to meet people outside.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What a bunch of assholes.

Yeah, it's really surprising that an ethical, upstanding company like Meta would pull a dick move like that. It's so out of character.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

an ethical, upstanding company like Meta

the hardest I've laughed this week 🥲

[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago

It seems like money shouldn't be able to buy a win in court for something so obvious, but here we are.

[–] Zoldyck 97 points 10 months ago (3 children)

They should rename it to Twitter

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago

Omg so much yes

[–] The_Vampire 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There's a very high chance Musk still has the rights to that trademark, unfortunately.

[–] Zoldyck 0 points 10 months ago
[–] 1847953620 5 points 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 53 points 10 months ago (2 children)

didn't it take "Meta" name as well?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 10 months ago

Because that’s what you do when you’re a trust find baby with no guard rails and plenty of money.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Dr. John Yardley, Threads Ltd’s managing director told Gizmodo in an email that Threads Ltd. waited four months to reach out to Meta to obtain enough legal advice to ensure they could “proceed with action with any reasonable confidence of winning it.”

Threads Ltd., owned by JPY Ltd., widely promoted the company since 2014, two years after it trademarked its name.

The company said in its letter that since its inception, it has licensed nearly 1,000 organizations globally and claims its sales are growing by an average of 200% per year.

“We recognize that this is a classic ‘David and Goliath’ battle with Meta,” Yardley said in the letter.

Meta launched Threads in June and gained 100 million users within the first five days, surpassing its competitor X.

A month later, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg said more than half of Threads users stopped using the platform.


The original article contains 393 words, the summary contains 146 words. Saved 63%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

Not a chance this holds up. But maybe an easy payout for the little guy

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

I don't even remember them anymore, I haven't heard from them since the endless news of their fast rise. How are they doing?

[–] Agent641 5 points 10 months ago

When I think of threads I think of