this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
164 points (96.1% liked)

politics

19241 readers
2827 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This guy is a real glutton for punishment

all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 123 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Scalise is a piece of shit, but Jordan is bigger, more dangerous piece of shit. He has been an enabler and encourager of all of the worst behavior we're seeing now and over the past few years. I truly hope this fails.

[–] captainlezbian 44 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah also he’s on the sex abusers in congress list

[–] A_cook_not_a_chef 8 points 1 year ago

The attendance list?

[–] Ersatz86 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Keep the faith my friend. These guys could screw up a wet dream.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not positive what this phrase means, but I agree with it

[–] Ersatz86 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’ll take your comment at face value and explain that a nocturnal emission benefits the participant the most, takes zero effort, and is pleasurable, yet these guys could somehow manage to foul up even so simple a task.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What was his relationship with Epstein? Were they shaking hands in strange places? Or is Gym sad they never got to connect over a 14 year old?

[–] Serinus 11 points 1 year ago

Just for reference, at Ohio State, Jim Jordan was the assistant coach of the wrestling team while the team doctor was (not very discretely) abusing students.

Jim Jordan's response to all this was to award the doctor "King of the Sauna".

Here's more detail from a reputable source: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/powerful-gop-rep-jim-jordan-accused-turning-blind-eye-sexual-n888386

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

McCarthy got 188 votes in conference and then went thru 15 rounds of voting on the floor to get 30 more votes to be elected speaker.

It will be even more of a challenge for Jordan to get 90+ votes.

He can go to the floor and risk losing on the first ballot. But if he lost on the first ballot, at least he’d know who is opposed to him so he can try to work them over.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From what I've heard, the Republicans already know the first vote is going to fail. Their only goal at this point is to avoid the clown fiesta that happened for McCarthy, so I'd expect a long gap between the first failed vote and the second vote as they try and get all their ducks in a row.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Jordan Still Doesn’t Have the Votes

In a second secret vote in the House Republican Conference, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) got just 155 votes from members would said they vote for him on the House floor, with 55 saying they would not.

Jordan is far short of the 217 votes he would need to win the speakership

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m cynical af, but my take is: never underestimate the “moderate republicans” willingness to bend the knee to the freedom caucus, and Trump.

[–] Zombiepirate 24 points 1 year ago

At some point it stops being cynicism and becomes observing reality.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

What the fuck 155 Republican Congressmen think this is a good idea?!?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are holdouts that say they won't vote for Jordan, not wanting to "reward bad behavior". I hope they hold

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

We both know those spineless losers will fall in line when the vote comes

[–] dynamojoe 25 points 1 year ago

The GOP should be endlessly taunted for being intentionally dysfunctional at such a critical time. Putin is drinking his best booze watching his principal opponent implode.

[–] Nobody 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Straight theater. No serious republicans want to spend the rest of this election cycle repealing Obamacare 500 times to die in the Senate.

Or worse yet, draw even more attention to how ridiculous the Biden impeachment fiasco has become. All their witnesses testified under oath that they had zero evidence.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who and how does some group of people find value in a Congress with no clear leader for an extended period of time ?

Who and how does some group of people find value in a US military combined forces with disrupted rank advancement & corroded hierarchy ?

Why is the answer to that repeatedly The GOP ?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

They're out to prove government doesn't work by ensuring it doesn't.

[–] jeffw 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds like the same story we heard earlier this week. Just replace "Jordan beats Scott" with "Scalise beats Jordan."

Do we just keep going until they run out of people to nominate?

[–] IchNichtenLichten 7 points 1 year ago

They could cut to the chase and nominate George Santos. It’s a step down from Galactic Emperor but he might go for it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


WASHINGTON, Oct 13 (Reuters) - Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives on Friday nominated hardliner Jim Jordan for speaker, setting up a vote that will test whether he can surmount the party divisions that led Steve Scalise to abandon his bid.

Representative Elise Stefanik, a member of the chamber's Republican leadership, said on social media that Jordan had won the closed-door vote, which had pit him against Austin Scott, a Georgia lawmaker who has kept a relatively low profile in his 12 years in Congress.

Without a speaker, the House is at a deadlock as war expands in the Middle East, Russia continues to pound Ukraine and the government faces a Nov. 17 partial shutdown deadline without additional funding from Congress.

Some Republicans have suggested expanding Representative Patrick McHenry's powers as temporary speaker, which would enable the House to take up aid to Israel and other pressing matters.

Republicans have been hoping to avoid a repeat of the embarrassing spectacle that occurred in January, when hardline conservatives forced McCarthy to endure 15 floor votes over four days before winning the gavel.

While McCarthy was the first speaker in U.S. history ousted by a vote of the chamber, the last two Republicans to hold the job - John Boehner and Paul Ryan - also left under pressure from their right flanks.


The original article contains 586 words, the summary contains 221 words. Saved 62%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Ersatz86 7 points 1 year ago
[–] ChunkMcHorkle 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

deleted by creator