Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Not that the headline isn't accurate. But anytime an article uses loaded words like 'slams' you automatically know it isn't going to report just the facts of what happened, and I usually just don't read articles like that.
Lemming SLAMS Journalists for Sensationalist Headlines!
Watch What Happens Next! Right after this advert for ear cleaner.
As a middle aged man, tell me more about this ear cleaner. Does it do anything for hair?
It makes you young again! Buy one, get one free at the low price of 19.99/month for 3 months!
I'll take two please.
YOU WOULDN'T BELIEVE WHAT 2 TRICKS PEOPLE HAD TO SAY IN THE COMMENTS.
I believe they were LASHING OUT
distantsounds CLAPS BACK against Lemmy user, click HERE for their response!
Lemmy User DESTROYED by comments.
This article was pretty much exactly what its headline said. It is mostly extensive quotes from Shawn Fain, which could aptly be described as "slamming" Trump.
I don't find that to be a particularly effective heuristic.
If a headline is click bait, you can't really expect the rest of the article to be honest and straightforward either. If that's not convincing enough, you can always find a few websites that rate news sites and see what they have to say about them.
Journalists write articles, editors write headlines. These two roles have different motivations, but it doesnt mean a editor making a clikbait title detracts from a reporter's journalist integrity.
Reporting can 100% be clean and fair even with bad headlines.
Not when most people just read the headlines, and the headlines are often biased and misleading
People's habits have nothing to do with a journalist's quailty of work. A fine article not read is still a fine article.
A fine article is less likely to have a clickbait headline than a clickbait article is. So it's a decent correlation.
"Reporting can 100% be clean and fair even with bad headlines."
This is the part I disagree with. People are very often misled by bogus clickbait headlines.
The Detroit free press went with this headline: ‘Let me be blunt’: UAW VP for GM has strong words about Trump’s visit to Michigan
Look at this guy who missed the absolute beatdown the UAW president put on Trump. Ran up on stage mid event and hit Trump with a clean double leg takedown
There’s something poetic about you randomly commenting this truthy-sounding rant on an article that it’s completely false about
You're free to believe what you want. But you're also wrong.
I generally agree, but I'm not sure "slams" is really that bad. It's when you see shit like "eviscerates," or "destroys".
Tbh, that headline tracks, the guy did slam him
"UAW president literally destroys Trump..."
The truth is that donnie has and always been a fake populist.