Patrick Crusius was sentenced to 90 consecutive life sentences
This is a non-story. Hell, if I was in prison, with no hope of reprieve, I'd agree to whatever you put in front of me. What were we supposed to learn here?
this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
65 points (97.1% liked)
News
23260 readers
3462 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Perhaps this is to ensure that any future income he might get is already earmarked for families. What income you ask? If a killer later signs a book deal or sells the movie/TV rights, that could represent quite a bit of money for the victims. By getting an agreement now, there won't be a fight in the future.
It's brilliant if this is why. I absolutely hate that serial killers can still sell thier story for money. Fuck you; you forfeit that right when you take someone elses life.
Yeah selling your criminal story should be considered proceeds of crime, right? Like, you only made that money because you did crime. 100% of money made from a crime in perpetuity should be given directly to victims.
I've watched the Legal Eagle on YouTube, and what seems to usually happen is that the damages, regardless of whatever the jury says, oftentimes have maximums that they have to be knocked down to. The point of aiming that high seems to be for the jury to send a message. After that, IIRC, even though they'll never be able to pay it all back, their wages will be garnished effectively for the rest of their life. Given that most Americans, who haven't been convicted of a felony, have trouble living paycheck to paycheck? Not to mention the fact that your average felon is never going to get a job worth a damn again, if at all?
Basically if this guy ever gets out of jail (what she won't with all those life sentences) he won't really have any prospects in life whatsoever. I'm not really a fan of that second part. But our "justice" system is all about punishment, not reform, no matter what they may tell you on TV.
You can't garnish wages in Texas state cases unless it's for child support. The US Code allows for it in federal cases, but it's mostly in case this guy gets money on a book deal or something insane like that.
Huh. TIL.
In other news Trump has one less voter.
If the families see a farthing, they’ll be lucky.
Considering farthings have been out of circulation for about 60 years, and never American currency, I think.
Maybe they'll put him on a work program or some shit and garnish the wages? No way that'll ever amount to $5mil though.
Or maybe he'll start a GoFundMe. /s
Since he's in prison, the reality is that the amount he's paying is negative. Instead of paying the government money in the form of a fine, he's costing the government money because he's in prison and needs to be fed, housed and guarded.
Indeed. It appears he didn't have a lucrative career beforehand. Even if he wasn't in prison and worked for 50 years and had 25% of disposable income garnished (the maximum amount) he'd need $37,000 of disposable income, per month.
I'm not saying those lives are worth less, they are definitely worth more. But this sum was never going to be recouped.
Am I missing something about how this racist psychopath is independently wealthy at 23? No? Then why even bother with this? He's already going to die in prison.
Through his family maybe.
They can go after estate but that's it. They can't go after siblings or children or parents.