this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
191 points (98.0% liked)

News

23029 readers
5829 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A Danish artist has been ordered to return nearly 500,000 kroner (€67,000) to a museum after he supplied it with two blank canvasses for a project he named "Take the Money and Run".

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 120 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the problem is this: the man was paid for his work. People don't seem to get that.

The deal was that he was paid an amount of money to make an art piece. That art piece was supposed to use another bunch of money as props. He was supposed to then give back the prop money after the exhibition was over.

When he made his work that used none of the money, that was fine. The museum rolled with it and gave him his dues. They didn't even ask for the prop money back when they realised he wasn't using it.

The problem is that he's now supposed to return the prop money that was to be used in the artwork, and he's refusing to.

He's already been paid, he's just being a shit to an organisation offering a public service.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He should pay them back in prop money.

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hell yeah! Let's fuck over museums, you know... those big evil corporations that house art and culture for society. Many are even nonprofits and help fund art projects and provide resources for creativity to underprivileged schools. Gross!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You do know the whole thing is probably increasing visibility of the museum and could be leveraged for more funding/donations than it would have received from just having typical artwork.

Sometimes the art is the story. Actually, most of the time the art is the story of how it was made.

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends 4 points 1 year ago

Key word is probably.

The only story here is a artist who stole money. I'm not arguing over being paid to make art and providing a blank canvas. I'm referring to the money that is supposed to be returned at the end of the contract.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That was the prop money. I guess if they'd known he'd steal it, they would've used fake prop money instead.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I should have said Monopoly money!

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Haaning told Danish radio:

The work is that I have taken their money. It’s not theft. It is breach of contract, and breach of contract is part of the work. I encourage other people who have working conditions as miserable as mine to do the same. If they’re sitting in some shitty job and not getting paid, and are actually being asked to pay money to go to work, then grab what you can and beat it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I really hate his justification because it seems incredibly selfish and short-sighted. Imagine if he murdered someone and said it wasn't murder because it was art. It can be both, and society might also argue it is not art or should not normatively be art.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I hate that he's trying to pass it off as some heroic Robin Hood gesture. If anyone actually follows his advice they're likely to get arrested.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

You can turn in a blank canvas and get away with it, you just have to give a great speech afterwards.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] FlyingSquid 6 points 1 year ago

"We can't believe he took the money and ran!"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Man is a LEGEND.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Seems like the obvious extension of Klein's monochromes.

The artist need not actually furnish the canvas with paint, for if we truly appreciate art we find that we carry the impression of painting within us. If you cannot appreciate this work, you must be lacking in imagination and vision, and therefore what right have you to judge the artist?

Also, props to the artist for creating the most unforgeable painting in history... or the most easily forgeable, depending on how you look at it.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The nothing painting has been done before sooo yeah I’m judging.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I’m surprised they didn’t catch it sooner.

[–] FlyingSquid 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Not quite as extreme but Joan Miro lit a series of his paintings on fire.

‘I have burned these canvases as another way of saying shit to all of those people who say that these canvases are worth a fortune.’

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

When you are running out of time and you don't have anything and you send a corrupted word/pdf at last minute to win time.

[–] FMT99 7 points 1 year ago

Doesn't feel that different from a lot of other super obvious self-congratulatory modern "art". Isn't the argument always "the art is in your observation" or "the act itself is the art" or some such bull? Just put the blank canvases on display and charge people to look at them like always.