this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
845 points (98.3% liked)

196

16216 readers
2809 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sheeple 96 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sowwy I skewed the statistics by drinking all the petrol I was thirsty πŸ˜–

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

Darn it Petrols Georg, not again

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (19 children)
[–] Bonskreeskreeskree 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Fuck cars is nothing but city dwellers that think their lifestyle is scalable to suburbs or the sticks.

[–] Noodle07 60 points 1 year ago (4 children)
[–] t_jpeg 12 points 1 year ago

indubitably based.

[–] Bonskreeskreeskree 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

eVeryOne sHouLd lIvE iN aPartmEntS anD bE haPpY aBoUt iT

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Bonskreeskreeskree 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Thankfully you won't ever be in a position of power to force people into cells. Ill keep living on my land 😁

[–] Sheeple 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can bet this dork doesn't even own land lmao

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I definitely want a more expansive public transportation system out here in the foot hills. A high-speed rail network to connect us to other parts of the state would be awesome. But it isn't feasible to get rid of all cars completely. A single parent out here can't be expected to make multiple bike trips for the equivalent of one grocery store run, up and down hills to feed multiple children and work a full time job. Some people out here live on roads where cars can barely drive on let alone a bus. edit: typo

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (6 children)

You've identified the problem. Now for solutions!

[–] Bonskreeskreeskree 5 points 1 year ago

The solution is individual vehicles for transportation. Congestion is not an issue in the sticks.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can I just say how much I loved Edinburgh for that? I was able to go to pretty much any bus stop, and have one that goes where I needed to go like every ten minutes.

That was quite a while ago though, and I think they wanted to build a tram network, so maybe that's changed

[–] paleasswhiteguy 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Best not to mention the trams in Edinburgh. They finally finished the line (all the way from the airport to the port in Leith) but it cost waaay more than planned, had to be done in two phases and was a massive ballache during the construction.

That said, it is an absolute win for public transport in the city but it did knock the confidence of residents. Mostly down to the piss poor management of the project by the council.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (6 children)

What about the women and children? Did they have to walk?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I transported them. I transported them all. Every single one of them. And not just the men, but the women and the children, too. They’re like passengers, and I transported them like passengers! I LOVE THEM!

bus

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FooBarrington 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They are always free to try and cling to the underside of the bus

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Up to 1989 british women and children weren't issued a bus loicence

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They aren't allowed to go out

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

1980s ads were stuck in the 1780s, confirmed?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

But how many gallons will 68 seamen take?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I agree that personal muscle cars are a "go fuck yourself" to the climate, but look at that bus. It doesn't look fast because it has no reason to be aerodynamic. That thing is either stopped or going like 30 mph a majority of the time. If driving takes you 15 minutes but taking the bus takes you an hour, those with enough money will trade it to get that time back.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Why does it need to be aerodynamic? You know you don't need a Formula 1 shaped car to go faster than 30mph right?

Also the bus pictured is a London city bus. They can't go faster anyways because of all the traffic in London. There's busses designed to go on the highway at least like 60 mph.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

That's why good public transit networks using multiple modes are important, as well as reducing car infrastructure to disincentivize driving at the same time

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί