this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
255 points (97.0% liked)

Today I Learned

17872 readers
17 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

👉 Garage Gallery

👉 Taryn Simon wiki

Taryn Simon collaborated with Russia’s State Atomic Energy Corporation (ROSATOM) to prepare a work of art made from nuclear material. In the year 3015, approximately one thousand years after its creation, a black square made from vitrified nuclear waste will be permanently displayed at Garage in a custom designed void that has been integrated into the new museum building.

all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] clearedtoland 69 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Bold and optimistic of the artist to assume humanity would thrive for that long.

Though I imagine that very thought is more likely the purpose of the art.

[–] thessnake03 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Buffaloaf 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Weird that they chose to make it out of concrete. I'm no expert, but won't the first block start to deteriorate after about 100 years?

[–] douglasg14b 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Depends on what the concrete is made of.

Not having rebar means it's going to be significantly more stable over time since you no longer have to worry about de-alkelineization (spelling is hard), and rust causing expansive forces inside the concrete and cracking it.

The chemical composition of the concrete will probably be improved over time as budget allows, increasing its longevity quite significantly.

[–] over_clox 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ancient structures used iron pins and bars, but they were covered with lead to protect them from rusting, plus lead is also plenty soft enough to not damage concrete.

Yes we all know lead is toxic, so just don't lick the lead covered pins/rebar during construction 👍

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Mmmm, lead-covered-rebars

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure that's the point of it, at least some of it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The only way this will ever get finished is if they form a religion whose goal is to build and worship the pyramid. Otherwise they forget why they even started putting blocks down and then some developer will eventually buy up the plot to build an Aldi3000 on it

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

And they even designed a place for it in a museum building. Wildly optimistic.

[–] Jumper775 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Zero chance this is still around in a thousand years. Just too damn long. He’ll I’d be surprised if any of our current societies or cultures still exist then.

[–] jmanes 19 points 1 year ago

I believe that is the entire point of the piece.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

It will be used to fuel the interdimensional portal gate by 2123

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd assume it would depend on the concrete. Some additives could affect the durability wildly.

Also I'd think some maintenance is planned for it anyways

[–] Jumper775 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Will that maintenance be carried out when needed for over a thousand years?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That's to be seen

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

China changed dynasties every few hundred years. Saying that the China from 2000 years ago is the same as today is like saying ancient Greece or Rome is still around today. China is not even the same country or culture as 75 years ago.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I bet they have a few pieces of art from 1,000 years ago.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ancient Greece still is around? Greek people exist, we practice the same religion we did over 1,700 years ago, we speak the same language, we preserve dances and culinary customs and more. Just because the clothing and architectural style changed doesn't mean shit

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, just forget about Byzantine Greece, Venice owning Greece, the Ottomans owning Greece, Nazis invading and conquering Greece, the Civil War, a dictatorship, and finally the current Greek government. Other than that, just one unbroken line of greekdom.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Greece

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Feel free to correct me if I've misunderstood your point, but are you saying that "Greece" in a historical context is not a unitary entity? But how can that be so when the very thing that creates this "unbroken line of Greekdom" you refer to is the the entire concept of a "History of Greece" that reaches back thousands of years in the first place?

If there is no unitary Greek identity that reaches back from the present to the Greeks of the past, then a history of Greece that includes the Roman conquest, the Ottomans, Byzantium, would be absurd (and shame on the Wikizens for including it in one conceptual lump as well, I guess).

You could say the same of Britain after 1066, or France after Henry VI. Or of Egypt after the merging of the kingdoms, or after the Ptolomys, etc; and yet most Egyptians would push back at the suggestion that there is no direct line from the age of pharaohs to the present day.

Being a nation with the same name, occupying at least a portion of its original geography, populated by many of the decedents of the same people -- well, that grants a country some pretty big ontological leeway. Who gets to decide whether the Greeks of today share the history and are of a piece with their ancient predecessors? Well the Greeks do, presumably. I mean, that's just the way I see it, I might be off on a wild tangent for all I know.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

A history of domination by foreigners doesn't mean we're not the same people. Assyrians, Jews, Kurds, Roma, and more people groups have stayed the same despite millenia of oppression

[–] BloodSlut 7 points 1 year ago

cool i cant wait to see it

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean i doubt that will be there in a 1000 years but cool. For those of you saying humans will be long gone. Why do you think that? Quite a simple minded way of thinking if you ask me. Humanity needs to spread out from earth and explore for new planets so we can thrive across the universe. Being stuck on this planet for eternity might actually make us go extinct though. (not caused by humans but other space things like asteroids for example) the end goal for humanity is to last till the end of time itself. If it means billions if not trillions of life's have to die to get to that point then so be it. If it means having to wipe out an entire alien species to save ourselves then so be it. If it means we have to hibernate for millions of years on ships then so be it.

I personally hope humanity lasts until that last atom in the universe has been destroyed.

[–] SpaceNoodle 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

You make us sound like a disease.

[–] Cellblend 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In some ways, we are, aren't we?

[–] SpaceNoodle 2 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Both are groups of organisms subject to the laws of evolution and ecology and trying to survive and propagate their species, yes. The comparison, while technically correct, is unhelpful and usually made in bad faith. In the grand scheme of things, life works similarly at all scales.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You could also say diseases work a lot like humans. We both do our best to spread and survive and adapt to our environments. That’s how nature works. That’s how a basic survival mechanism works.

From trees creating seeds that fly well on the wind and dropping them from great heights, to humans exploring and colonizing, to diseases spreading and growing in an attempt to survive as best as they can, we’re all the same in that basic way.

[–] SpaceNoodle 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We don't adapt to our environments; we adapt our environments to us.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

lol that’s funny, one of our biggest dividers - skin color - is literally just us adapting to our environment to create the appropriate levels of vitamins based on how much sun we’re getting. Wild that you genuinely believe that we don’t adapt. How do you think we got to this point?

[–] SpaceNoodle 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Perhaps I could have better worded it as that we are adapting our environment to us at a vastly greater rate than we had adapted to our environment prehistorically.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

But we’re still adapting to it, just as disease and trees do. What you’re saying now isn’t a counter to my statement, what you said before was…

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Nah just plain ol survival.

[–] RoyaltyInTraining 4 points 1 year ago

The hole in the wall would already classify as art