this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
14 points (64.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35819 readers
1087 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] breadsmasher 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Irrelevant when the alternative is a fascist moron from gop

[–] kava 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wouldn't it be more relevant? The stakes are high. Dems losing this election could have serious consequences.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/biden-approval-rating/

Biden's approval rating is only 0.6% higher than Trump's at the same time period. He's not a popular president. The economy isn't doing well which has a very high impact on election results.

I think Democrats are taking a big risk going with Biden again, although I guess they would be taking a big risk changing him out too. What a mess, honestly.

[–] breadsmasher 2 points 1 year ago

What a mess

Yeah absolutely

[–] Guy_Fieris_Hair 0 points 1 year ago

Not irrelevant. Remember 2016? The options were even worse and we ended up with the cheeto. Since the DNC decided to stick with the senile sock puppet I would bet money we end up with Pence. And they will keep turning this country into a religious state. The DNC is fine with that too, because at least pence will play by the rules and keep everyone's doners happy. That is the only reason they hated Trump so badly. Had nothing to do with his actions, it was that he said the quiet parts out loud.

[–] MicrosoftSam 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why would people downvote a question on no stupid questions?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

There may be no stupid questions but there are a lot of stupid people.

[–] snausagesinablanket 1 points 1 year ago

Because they are the same crew of trolls from Reddit with the same petty thoughts.

[–] kartonrealista 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Never say never, but I don't think it matters all that much, with Trump in jail. But to answer your question, incumbent changing their running mate seems tantamount to admitting failure and you want people to view your administration as successful.

[–] severien 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Expect a lot of discussions what will happen with Biden dying in office, and that becomes even more possible.

And imagining Kamala as a president is a big turn off.

[–] kartonrealista 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Compared to what? Trump? DeSantis? I don't think so.

[–] severien 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Some voters may see two bad choices and not seeing any decent choice won't vote at all.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not voting is a vote for Trump

[–] severien 3 points 1 year ago

That's the point.

[–] kartonrealista 2 points 1 year ago

That's something you may think if you're 5 y/o and going on vibes. Every decision you face not only has the consequences if you choose it, but also if you don't.

A pure hypothetical to demonstrate the general principle on an extreme example (not a direct comparison): you have an election with two candidates: one runs on a promise of Holocaust 2.0 and the other will twist your ankle after he wins. Would you say you can't choose because both are bad? Obviously you would under any case want to avoid the worse outcome. Because not doing anything is risking that bad outcome, even if the alternative is bad. The upcoming election is not that extreme, but my example should have demonstrated the principle: inaction in face of greater evil is wrong.

There is no absolute good in this world, and if you can't choose between Kamala Harris and those horrible people you moral compass is out of whack. When you don't vote, the choice is made for you. Whether something is good or bad has to be evaluated considering possible alternatives, you can't just not choose and expect a miracle to happen.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I asked a friend this the other day and they didn't know. In the last election Harris seemed to be set up to take over from Biden at the next election, but since then I've not heard anything about her or what she's been up to as VP. What happened?

[–] Guy_Fieris_Hair 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Bidens neural implant was successful so she wasn't needed. But seriously. It's frustrating if the DNC used any common sense they could snuff the Republicans for the next few elections after what just happened with Trump. But instead they just decided to use the opportunity to be slightly less of a bad choice than the Republicans. They have to skate that line, they cant just put in someone who would be actually liked by the people. They have to install someone who plays as far by their rules as they can get and will also keep the election close so we don't swing to far to the left.

[–] xc2215x 5 points 1 year ago

With Kamala as VP a higher chance.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Biden can't win the election without Harris.

Keep in mind that U.S. elections are not popular elections. You have to look at key swing states. Technically, none of the other 43~ states matter much because their outcomes are already statistically pre-determined. It doesn't matter how much people like Biden in California or New York, if he loses key states. For instance, Hillary Clinton had twice as many popular votes in California as Trump in 2016. But those extra 4 million extra votes didn't matter to the outcome because California is just one State.

For example, Michigan is a key electoral state. It is predominantly a red state. But Barak Obama won it two elections in a row because minorities from the densely populated areas, especially Wayne county, turned out for him. Those same minorities did not turn out when Hillary Clinton ran in 2016. They came back ... just barely ... when Biden ran with Harris as VP. This same story is repeated in Georgia and Wisconsin -- both swing states that usually lean heavily Red.

So, to sum up. It doesn't matter how much people in red states hate on Harris. Their election results have already been factored. What matters is how she is perceived in key swing states. While some red state voters won't vote for Biden because they fear he might keel over, other swing state voters will ... for exactly the same reason!

[–] snausagesinablanket 1 points 1 year ago

I think that no matter what, the younger voters will decide this time, but the old codgers that can barely walk better get up and do their share too. It doesn't help that in some states they have made it very difficult for poor folks and minority neighborhoods to vote.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] Zippy 1 points 1 year ago