this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
341 points (94.8% liked)

tumblr

3480 readers
2 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.


Sister Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This cannot really come as a surprise to anyone who has been paying attention.

all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PunnyName 62 points 1 year ago

Just gonna keep posting this

[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Just a matter of time before it's "a union of one white male and one white female"

[–] MyFairJulia 53 points 1 year ago

Back when Roe v. Wade was overturned, the SC announced that other judgements are to be reconsidered. Among them is the one that allowed interracial marriages.

[–] givesomefucks 24 points 1 year ago

They'll keep going till it's like the old days where a father owned his daughters and decided who they married.

Everyone gets that.

This slow walking isn't to trick people into supporting the current step, it's because they know if they jump to the final step, nonvoters will vote and stop it.

Religious extremism only works when a large amount of people don't vote

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Reminder that this is why the right wing calls everything a slippery slope. Because that's what they want to do, so they project that everyone else wants to do it too.

[–] nostalgicgamerz 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is SCOTUS bait. This is to overturn the Obama era legal same sex marriage via SCOTUS decision

This is going to be more “states rights” bullshit…until they can force it on everyone

[–] EvilEyedPanda 20 points 1 year ago

First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out because I was not a socialist-

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out because I was not a trade unionist-

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out because I was not a Jew-

And then they came for me, and there was no one left to speak

~Martin Niemöller~

[–] totallynotarobot 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

one male and one female

No species specified...

[–] ChunkMcHorkle 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

deleted by creator

[–] TheSpookiestUser 14 points 1 year ago

It doesn't come as a surprise. I don't think anyone here is surprised.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am lucky enough to live in New England which is pretty left-leaning but I'm scared that my rights will just slowly be stripped away just because I'm bi. Fuck the SCOTUS and fuck Republicans.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Same. Keep an eye on how they're going mifepristone and abortion rights at a federal level in regards to how they will subvert "protected" blue states.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

Does the person posting this think that people that support gay marriage don’t also support trans, sex worker, and abortion rights?

It’s not a very good told-you-so when the people you’re told-you-so-ing agree with you.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's more common than you'd think. There's a disappointingly high number of transphobic gays and lesbians, and there are definitely people who are pro-gay marriage who are anti-sex worker. I definitely think it's rarer for people to support gay rights and not support abortion rights though.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Huh. Then I guess their audience sucks.

[–] Drivebyhaiku 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I routinely see in and amongst the right wing protesters where I see gay men holding up signs that throw trans people under the bus. A lot of the attitudes in gay bars can be hostile and misogynistic towards trans men too.

They get to feel respectable so long as they are the ones participating in the oppression and the bigots get to use these people as shields - "look how reasonable we are, we have gay people who support us SEE ?!" but it's all disposable. Once they've successfully oppressed the people on the outside the Conservatives turn to the next layer of the circle in reverse order of acceptance. Suddenly the bigotry is at the door for the idiots who supported them and their friends who were using them as shields don't need them anymore.

The Nazis did this too. Gay men joined up with the brownshirts hoping to find safety and acceptance in the ranks. They participated in the dismantling of their own communities and then the minute they were judged to be no longer useful they were purged and executed in the Night of Long Knives.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

deleted by creator

[–] GabrielBell12fi 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Look up the LGB Alliance. They are not nice people.

[–] Ultraviolet 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They're also extremely biphobic, so I guess the B in the name is just there to prevent an electronics company from suing them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Maybe the B stands for "But nobody else"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am also confused by this. I'm sure there are a fair share of gay people voting Republican - there were Jewish people in the nazi party as well - but implying the Republicans got to power on a wave of gay votes is just beyond absurd.

[–] vind 4 points 1 year ago

It's not implying that republicans got to power because of gay votes, but rather that organisations such as the LGB Alliance and the multitude of TERFS that have helped this happen through advocating against Trans folk. They're not the sole reason, but they're still a big part especially when they've attempted to fracture progressive movements.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, who told whom what exactly? Seems to be implying that LG don't care about BTQ+, but this move is entirely consistent with Republican / right ideology, which LG hasn't never been a big part of.

It's never been a secret either. It has been an explicit and public position of Republicans (and part of SCOTUS) since forever.

Same sex marriage has only been legal in all 50 states since 2015. Does anyone really believe that Republican leaders and the new right-wing SCOTUS miraculously changed their minds after Obergefell v Hodges?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The people being admonished for inaction aren’t bigots, they’re average folks who simply didn’t believe that society would slide into the 1940s again. A fair proportion of voters saw undoing roe v wade as the final piece to the republican master plan, and an existential threat to all Americans used only to spur voters on both sides to vote. It’s chiding naivety.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Lots of TERFS are lesbians who hate trans people, trans women in particular, and want to make sex work illegal.

[–] 0Empty0 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Things my state has added in the past year, which I am so, so happy about.

  1. Made it a crime for librarians and bookstores to provide minors with materials deemed “harmful” to them. (Temporarily blocked by a judge.)
  2. Made Delta marijuana variants illegal
  3. Adding cameras to interstates to catch drivers speeding in work zones.
  4. Forced sign-ins to porn sites.
  5. Rolled back requirements that the state verify the ages of workers under 16 and provide them with work certificates permitting them to work.

We could have had a governor who has a PhD from MIT, but no. He was blue, and also black. Didn't matter that he was an ordained minister in the Bible belt either.

[–] randon31415 7 points 1 year ago

#3 seems out of place. Yes, it could be abused for other purposes, but do we really hate road-workers and want to see them killed?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's Delta marijuana strains?

[–] 0Empty0 3 points 1 year ago

It's a variant that is legal in most states, so long as it has less than .3% of THC.

There are some valid concerns about them, and they should be regulated more, but that is not why they made them illegal.

[–] archiotterpup 5 points 1 year ago

We all fucking called it. I want to show this to every enlightened centrist and shake them.

[–] LEDZeppelin 4 points 1 year ago

Where do the Mormons fit in the definition?