this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
314 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

2907 readers
3064 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in [email protected]. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @[email protected], @[email protected], or @[email protected].

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Elected politicians and candidates in Wales who deliberately lie could face serious consequences, including being removed from office, under proposals aimed at restoring trust in politics.

The Senedd’s (Welsh parliament) standards of conduct committee has recommended legally defining political deception, and strengthening existing rules to explicitly ban misleading statements. Proposed potential penalties range from a formal retraction to suspension or, in extreme cases, recall by voters.

[...]

These efforts see Wales become the first UK nation to attempt to tackle the problem of dwindling trust in politics by modern day legislative force.

Those championing the changes refer to how the deliberate rise in campaigns of misinformation, by those of all political persuasions, have in some instances led to electoral victories overseas.

The need to act is also reflected in the public’s perception. Surveys have consistently found that trust in politicians to tell the truth has declined. A survey in 2023 placed politicians as the least trusted profession in the UK. Just 9% of the public said they trusted elected officials to tell the truth.

More recently, findings from the British social attitudes report in 2024 revealed that the public is as critical now of how the UK is governed as it has ever been. A record high of 45% of respondents said they now β€œalmost never” trust governments of any party to place the needs of the nation above the interests of their own political party.

[...]

While, research had found that more than two-thirds of Welsh voters supported a law criminalising political lying, judicial adjudication for serving Senedd members has been ruled out. The report [opens pdf] also details concerns from the legal professions that existing resource pressures on the courts would have lead to long disputes, rather than the swift resolutions.

But in reality, we are talking about strengthening safeguards for maintaining standards in public offices. In particular addressing deliberate mistruths by politicians to secure deceitful advantages during an election.

In that sense, the new legislation is essentially bringing the political profession in line with others such as lawyers, doctors, journalistic and financial institutions, by having clearer repercussions when they lie and fail to maintain professional standards.

Given the need for something to change in order to restore trust, and the extensive powers that politicians have to affect the lives of citizens, it is clear why Wales is trying a different approach towards restoring trust.

all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LovableSidekick 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Every elected official takes an oath of office - what if not lying to the public was included in that oath, and violating that oath was a felony with a specific mandatory penalty?

[–] [email protected] 95 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

legally defining political deception, and strengthening existing rules to explicitly ban misleading statements.

I'm all for this. No, it won't be perfect. Yes, it will sometimes be abused (e.g. against opponents). But this needs to be enshrined in law: politicians must be held to a higher set of moral standards while in office. Sometimes it feels like reality is the exact opposite: every job requires this, except politics.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I share the sentiment but I'm terrified of what that means.

Now there's people documenting facts and polititians saying stuff, sometimes cherry picking, sometimes lying to get an advantage.

If you tie the two you will bring this pressure primarily onto the documentation of facts themselves.

You would get (even more) fake paper for fake research, no more journalist on the ground, officer making statement that contradicts reality.

I mean, even more than what you do have today.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It can be tied, at least, to discourse about policies, to "campaign promises".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

In this limited scope it could be more feasible but the weirdness there stems from the fact that... The system is meant for people to... Stop voting for those that betray you?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

The system can only work as long as there is anyone left who doesn't betray the voters. Also you can't easily prevent people from falling for attractive lies.

On top of that, telling lies is way easier than debunking them. In the time it takes to debunk one lie, the liars have pumped out dozens of new ones.

[–] Eheran 16 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

Now all you need to do is prove that it was deliberate. Good luck with that. "Oh I forgot XYZ"

[–] [email protected] 20 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Then they have to formally retract their statement. Do it enough times and the pattern becomes clear.

[–] qarbone 10 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, force them to fund with their own money a marketing campaign with specified outreach or certain length to specified media (TV, internet, print, etc) for a specified amount of time that lists what they said and what they were wrong about.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Even just maintaining an "I was wrong" section on a website with an exhaustive list. And then they must print it out at election time and distribute to all voters.

Unfortunately, they real issue is that "I dont recall" will become the default response to all questions...

[–] [email protected] 9 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, they real issue is that "I dont recall" will become the default response to all questions...

"I don't recall" doesn't get voters, though, so they'll need to figure something out.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago

It does work if you have a personality cult and can get others to lie for you though...

[–] [email protected] 9 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

I don't know how it works for public lies, but sometimes the action can be juged regardless of the intention. A lie based on "honest mistake" but with bad consequences could be condemnable negligence or something like this.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 14 hours ago

It's something courts deal with all the time.

[–] itsathursday 2 points 15 hours ago

Fool me once shame on me, fool me twice…

[–] [email protected] 10 points 15 hours ago

Sounds like a good idea in theory that would not work in practice, or even worse, would be weaponzied politically. But maybe I’m just cynical due to the current state of world politics.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago

I expect some kind of knotted rope would do the trick.