Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
And Trump wants to make Canada a part of the U.S. so we can be a part of this hate and bullshit? Yeah go stuff it up your asses. Pathetic and horrible both at the same time.
I guess it’s bound to happen when you vote in a rapist criminal to lead you.
The intention was always to flood the news with headlines so that the real power grab is obfuscated. Reagan was doing a similar thing when he was running. McDrumpf just turned it up to eleven.
It's a waste of time conversation. Only way that would happen is war.
Let's go. There are many that would fight our own countrymen to help correct this shit.
I don't want to fight my countrymen, I want to fight those assholes in power.
I mean.. Thomas point blank said so after Dobbs.
However, those bills would create a category of legal marriage called "covenant marriage,” which can only take place between a man and a woman, and which generally require premarital counseling and greater restrictions on seeking divorce.
So are they trying to work around the Full Faith and Credit Clause that says that each state needs to honor the proceedings of other states? To say "that other state doesn't have covenant marriage, so you can't divorce from a covenant marriage using that other state's proceess?"
Or are they just trying to create some sort of scheme to raise the bar for divorce for people not willing to go out-of-state to get a divorce?
https://www.divorcenet.com/resources/basic-divorce-residency-requirements-in-your-state.html
The clearest outlier is Nevada (as discussed below). Physical presence in Nevada for six weeks is enough to meet the residency requirement, even if your permanent home is in another state.
Like, if you want to get a divorce in Nevada, you can go spend a month-and-a-half in Nevada and then basically disregard whatever your home state's divorce restrictions are. That's still a not-inconsiderable barrier, though.
I'm a little suspicious that if the idea is the former, to create a whole new form of formal relationship so that other states will not permit one to exit the relationship, that probably some other state is going to have some activists go get "covenant marriage" added in that state too...and just have really weak barriers to exit it.
Before I read it, wonder if Idaho is on there?
Edit: yep my home state continues to disappoint :/
Had the same feeling. I'm pretty sure my state will join up. Fucking shitmess.
I agree on the headline, it's time for change, we should totally ban traditional marriage. 😋
Idaho is always on the wrong side of history, but fuck the Dakotas.
Also, what the fuck is wrong with Michigan these days? Voting for Trump and now this?
It's only getting legislation introduced. I'm sure you could find a nut job state rep in every state that would be willing to go along with forcing their religious extremism on the rest of us.
Sorry to tell you, but no one is ever on the wrong side of history.
It just gets written like that by the side that won later...
I wonder how it's going for the "LGB community".