this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
161 points (83.7% liked)

Technology

63186 readers
6303 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

El Pais paywall can be disabled via reader view in your web browser.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Most men are not much into the idea, either.

Intimacy is something very human, something most people are not ready to trust a machine to do, even if it's capable of visibly empathetic reactions.

There is a desire to connect with another human being, not programmed to like you, but actually choosing you freely. It's what people call "feeling it real".

Most folks I have seen pushing for robotic partners are incels craving at least some form of closeness - having something like this might be better than nothing.

Also, dudes, let's be real: would you put your dick into a machine much stronger than you? Something goes wrong and you don't have your precious parts anymore.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 13 hours ago (2 children)
[–] CascadianGiraffe 5 points 7 hours ago
[–] kemsat 15 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

I dunno, everyone was cool with the love story of Wanda & The Vision from the MCU. I guess fucking robots is not ok, but becoming emotionally attached to one is?

[–] Cocodapuf 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

The love story in the movie "Her" is even more impressive. It's impressive because it's not even a robot, it's just an AI voice and yet the love story is still compelling. And it also asks bigger questions, sure there's the question of could a person fall in love with a machine, and is that ok? But it goes further to ask, if the machine is actually intelligent, what does the machine see in the humans? Do the machines actually still need the humans at all?

[–] GladiusB 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think that's a linear logic. We all know Vision is a robot. But we also know it's a story about a robot that is played by a man. We are watching for the spectacle, not because we believed the story to be real.

[–] T156 3 points 7 hours ago

Vision was also a robot with human-type consciousness and intelligence. We can, at least, nudge that into "funny-looking human" through suspension of disbelief.

Our level of robots is nowhere near that.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I will get a sex robot when it can scoop catboxes and fold laundry.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

You're into some weird shit but I respect it

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 hours ago

Genius! It will sell even without the sex

[–] essteeyou 45 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Realistically how is a man going to design a good sex robot for a woman? Let a woman do that, they'll get what they want.

[–] shalafi 25 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Women already have the perfect sex bot. It's called a Sybian.

[–] Jarix 15 points 18 hours ago (11 children)

And if that Sybian could pick you up, and stroke your thighs, massage your breasts, have hips and legs to simulate the sexual positions that it can't provide you, while still being what it is, there is a huge room for improvement on the design of the sybian and what great things it does

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] bhamlin 8 points 20 hours ago (7 children)

✅: Does what it's asked to do

✅: Doesn't talk back

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Rhoeri 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

There are plenty of women who don't have intercourse regularly, but they are less likely than their male counterparts to whine about it.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

They are less likely to be much concerned, even.

Men, on average, have a stronger sexual drive.

[–] JustARaccoon 1 points 2 hours ago

Hahahahaha no

[–] shaggyb 27 points 20 hours ago

You're telling me women don't like vibrators.

[–] Ceedoestrees 40 points 23 hours ago

Speak for yourself. Gimme that drama free dick.

[–] [email protected] 268 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

I guess a vibrator isn't a type of sex robot?

Just saying that these sort of toys were way more normalized for women long before they were for men.

A man with a fleshlight was a gross weirdo, a woman with a vibrator is a strong independent woman taking control of her sexuality and not settling for the weakness of flesh in men.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 21 hours ago

This was my thought. Its the same way all our technology has grown. Honestly I think brain interfaces could eclipse robots like this before they are that great. As scary as that is.

[–] python 45 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Colloquially, the word "robot" always implies a certain amount of anthropomorphism. So no, I don't think a vibrator would count, as basically no vibrators on the market try to look human-like.

But that definitely is a weird difference between male and female sexuality - the sex toys women buy most are the very effective and utilitarian ones: Vibrator wands, Rabbits, Air pulse Vibrators etc.

While the most popular tools for men tend to focus on "realism"(?): Fleshlights, Sex Dolls, things like VR and POV porn. And I guess sex robots would fall into that category too in the future.

I can absolutely see the weirdness-factor of someone who is desperately trying to emulate a partner rather than just accept masturbation as a solo activity and optimize it from there 😬

[–] BradleyUffner 6 points 15 hours ago

Slap a pair of googly eyes on it and it as good as has a soul.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 day ago (3 children)

A robot doesn't need to be anthropomorphic, an assembly line robot is still a robot. It does however need to be able to perform some actions autonomously, for which a vibrator hardly qualifies.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 22 hours ago

It does however need to be able to perform some actions autonomously, for which a vibrator hardly qualifies.

Fuck Machine has entered the chat

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I'm no expert on attraction, but what if the sex robot looked like a skeleton?

[–] Lawnman23 11 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I want to get off Mr. Bones Wild Ride.

[–] MycelialMass 1 points 6 hours ago

I want to get off on Mr. Bones Wilde Ride.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Sex with a hella sexy robot? Nice.

Using a hella sexy robot to fill the emptiness of no intimacy or authentic mutual connection? Not nice.

For some reason sex with a robot doesn't feel gross to me — until they start using it to fill a hole (hehe)

[–] [email protected] 12 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (3 children)

What about for people who struggle to have emotional intimacy and sexual intimacy throughout their lives because of medical issues or mental health issues?

My ex has a brother who is now pushing 40 and has never even held a woman's hand. He has severe mental disabilities and will never live life on his own without some kind of caretaker. We know he looked at porn, partially because he refused to ever let people fix up his computer, usually out of fear of people seeing his porn.

Does he not deserve emotional and sexual intimacy? There is a high likelihood he will never have it otherwise.

until they start using it to fill a hole

What about, like in the situation I just described, when that hole will otherwise go a lifetime of being unfulfilled? Is that fair to them for being born a way they didn't choose?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] OmnislashIsACloudApp 6 points 18 hours ago

every time I see crap like this it make me think about that 30rock porn for women skit with Tina Fey

[–] [email protected] 88 points 1 day ago (20 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 21 hours ago

and this is why uBlock origin is the be all end all of extensions.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

They don't ~~that~~ have that much appeal to me as well, and I'm a dude.

load more comments
view more: next ›